安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Nothing is overclocked ... the contrary is the case, voltages and temps look excellent. I can imagine a bsod at times but hoping it will run fine from now on.
asus was overvolting when using it, do not use it on asus boards
It wan't just an Asus issue and it has been addressed in recent AGESA/Bios updates.
As far as post times go my system has taken about 15 seconds from pressing the power button to the Windows login. That is running DOCP II and Memory Context Restore, (4) 16gb 6000 cl30 dimms. I know some people have issues with MCR but it's always worked fine for me.
Yup, Asus got the flack because of how they worded notes for a Bios update. Essentially being update with this Beta Bios that may fix the issue, it didn't, and in doing so void your warranty or don't update bios and risk damage to CPU and maybe motherboard. Should have worded it better or not even bothered making it available, especially when it didn't work anyway
I think the whole warranty thing was blown out of proportion. AMD and Asus both issued statements at the very start that if you were affected by the issue to start the RMA process and they would take care of it. The beta bios disclaimer has been used by Asus for as long as I can remember. I work for a large corporation and I can tell you legal teams are a thing, but people where trying to make it seem like Asus just started to use this disclaimer in an attempt to avoid responsibility which just isn't true. Maybe they could have done some things different but I think it was turned into a bigger thing that it actually was.
^ 100% especially by Jayz2cents. He has become such a bandwagon content creator it's sad.
First world problems? lol
However, I know a lot of what is slowing down my BIOS time is the number of drives I use too.
The fastest "off to on" system I ever had was ironically the cheapest and slowest. It was a Dell laptop with a 4010U and Crucial BX500 (low end SATA SSD). It didn't matter if I had 2 GB in it (came with 6 GB, later upgraded to 16 GB), it started faster than anything else I ever had.
Just tried, my real name is on the Windows sign-in screen and I don´t want that, have no idea how to edit videos and not really interested in learning that.
Another thing which baffled me is how dirty it is around here, my camera picked up what I can´t see with my bare eyes, time to do some cleaning.
But I have no real reason to lie about this, I actually wrote another post earlier this month about how unhappy I was with the AM5 setup because of slow post times.
You can go into task manager under "startup apps" and in the upper right there is a "last bios time" which is basically your post time. I think 5 seconds is probably a bit of a stretch for AM5.
That said, I don't think post/boot-time is a very important metric on computers as it is. Even, with double-digit boot times I wasn't about to sit in front of the screen and groan about how slow it was on any of my previous PCs.
It's kinda like how it takes a few seconds for fluorescent lights to flicker on in the basement after flicking the wall switch, which is a minor inconvenience at worst.