Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
It's a long term market duopoly, one that has been filled with collusion (!) between themselves and their lone competitor (at the time ATI, and now AMD), and one that is an effective monopoly at the moment due to lack of competition from their competition.
The last time the PC sector saw this was with Intel in the mid 2010s, and they also got criticized for it. Not quite as much (notice the recurring thing is both Intel and nVidia were the more popular brands in the market so that explains why the backlash was slow and quiet to start until it actually got bad enough), but then again as I said my opinion was that nVidia is doing it to an even further extreme.
The recent criticism has merit to me, but that's just my opinion, and that is why.
Just in terms of reality, no, a given trend existing doesn't mean it will always be one. Things come and go, ebb and flow, rise and decline. Such is reality. Current trajectories aren't guaranteed to be static.
By that's more of a long term, stepped back approach. If you're in the market of making something that needs to get faster to encourage people to upgrade, then if the gains become smaller and the prices become higher, it puts people off from upgrading as often. There exist people who will upgrade anyway, but the majority of the market isn't like those you'll find around here, who upgrade to the high end every other generation almost regardless. The reality that "things aren't always guaranteed or constant" isn't going to prevent criticism (nor from it having merit) from the rest.
Sure, nVidia doesn't OWE consumers a given price for performance pacing. Nor do consumers owe nVidia a good opinion based on the fact that "well, that's reality" regardless of their offerings. It's a two way street.
You can be less than capable of working for a given company but still have opinions that they are "doing something wrong".
A distinction needs to be drawn here. Companies define success in profits, consumers define success in satisfaction with a given offering.
All you're pointing out is that these can be at odds, and that some consumers wouldn't make great people to lead a company to success by modern systemic definitions. It doesn't mean those complaints have no meaning.
Yep, for 499.
The extra buck, which was significant, wasn't worth it for me.
What do you think is a fair price for that?
Still way too high
The Mindfactory sales analysis will be interesting to see. Cards are more expensive in the EU and i do wonder how the consumer reacts to these new cards.
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/mindfactory-researchthe-cost-of-a-graphics-card-increased-by-a-factor-of-two-between-2020-and-2023.html
The 4060 Ti, regardless of the 8 or 16GB variant, only serves to make the rest of their lineup look good or a "better value".
And for some ungodly reason, AMD managed to turn that perfect opportunity into a failure when they panicked.
All Intel has to do is stay silent and do their thing.
Ideally it would have been a 192-bit/12 GB product in one flavor and just cost around $350 and I'd say it would be decently appealing (this puts it at slightly better performance than the 6700 XT, at around the same price and at the same VRAM, so it lines up, and again that is only expecting it to MATCH old generations on price/performance when it SHOULD be improving it). Instead, it was created as so much of a cut down chip that the fix to one of its issues (limited VRAM) is costly and makes it not worth it.