Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
4070 Ti is average about 20% faster then 3080 but in some games in 4K 3080 comes very close.
Honestly 4070 Ti is not that great 4K card, if you want to play in 4K it`s better to go with 4080.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8ETNnQW33s
Between those two, the RTX 4070 Ti is objectively a bit faster. Probably a quarter faster give or take? It also has 2 GB more VRAM, and even it's probably going to run into issues with VRAM at times. So the 10 GB on an RTX 3080 will already be a concern, especially if you do high settings (or add ray tracing).
The new generation is more of a supplement to the prior one rather than an improvement that replaces it (RTX 4090 aside). In an ideal world, it wouldn't be $250 more expensive than the prior generation's one tier higher SKU, because that represents stagnation rather than progress, but here we are. And looking just at performance, it falls about in line with it.
So if you have the $250 extra and you're looking to prolong it, yes, I'd go with it. 12 GB is already concerning for someone looking at higher settings/resolutions, so 10 GB would be more so.
OP's not necessarily asking that though. They're looking at a new PC with an RTX 3080 and it can be changed to an RTX 4070 Ti.
Now yes, they have an RTX 30 series card right now, but it's pointless since they're talking about cards twice as fast, and then some.
You don't hold off on an upgrade if it's substantially faster SOLELY because it's only one generation newer. The entire reason the "don't upgrade from one generation to the next" advice is a thing is because it mostly presumes you're buying it the same tier, in which case the uplift won't have become large enough in just one generation to make it worth the cost.
But that doesn't apply to OP.
I also think you are looking at about your minimum uptick to be an actual upgrade at all in the same generation one full sku up from what you already have.
4070ti? Smaller bus and still only has 12GB. 1440p card.
Of course you can make it work but you are looking to start off just over barely making it either way.
I'd do neither and just use a 4k monitor if I bought one for media and legacy games/upscaling some newer ones but if it is hell or high water then the 4070ti.
At least .you have a little more vram and might be able to make use of frame generation sometimes.
A 4k monitor ought to come with a warning sticker that says the purchase of this product may lead to a continuous commitment to a flagship card every generation.
i5 13500 or i712700? i5 is cheaper and perform a few % better on benchmark, who would run coolest of this two option and for gaming only both should be enough?
Im on a budget around 2000-2300 dollar and i cant go over that.
with its overclock abilities it will serve you for many years