Most demanding game overall ?

[Peterg]

What pc game do you think is most demanding in hardware ?

[xSOSxHawkens]

vadim님이 먼저 게시:

xSOSxHawkens님이 먼저 게시:

I started saying it was the most demanding game.

Everyone said the same, so don't take credit for it.

xSOSxHawkens님이 먼저 게시:

I said it uses 12-24 threads actively. It does.
Fact.

It's a lie. As your own source said, 6c/6t i5-9600k has nearly the same performance as a 8c/16t i9-9900k.

xSOSxHawkens님이 먼저 게시:

I said it uses large amounts of Ram, up to 10-16GB, and it does.
Fact.

No. That's even more than a lie. You said completely opposite: "will make good use of 32GB of ram". Everyone can check that. You were unable to provide any proof and I proved that this game does NOT get any single additional FPS if RAM is more than 16 GB. So, again you're a liar.

xSOSxHawkens님이 먼저 게시:

I said it regularly caps out 8GB cards. It does.
Fact.

You said: "will peg out most 8GB graphics cards and makes good use of 11-16GB cards". I proved it works fine on RTX 2060.

Have you ever heard about system requirements? Look at them in the shop. You will be surprised.

And last, but not least. YOU are the only troll here.

xSOSxHawkens님이 먼저 게시:

...and supporting trollish behaviour...
Fact and another supporting bahviour that you are indeed a troll.
...
Fact - and another supporting trollish behaviour.

Your behviours imply uou are, in fact, a troll.

Go home troll.
...
Ignore trolls like vadim

You have not been able to provide a single proof of your original words. When you were poked into your lies, you continued to lie and dodge. You're just an uneducated AMD fan who has no balls to admit that the ancient i7-7700k performs better than the Ryzen 2700 with twice as many cores and threads.
You are do ignorant than you believe that only English resources can be reputable. You cannot understand other languages and proud of that.
You can not even understand that this is international forum, not English-only.
You gave me the link for testing 4 CPUs in this game, I gave for rigorous testing of 31.
So, who of us is a troll? The answer is obvious...

Uhg... More obvious dribble from someone who has *not* played the game, and its obvious from your reply...

"It's a lie. As your own source said, 6c/6t i5-9600k has nearly the same performance as a 8c/16t i9-9900k."

Just because it doesnt get a higher average FPS does *not* mean it doesnt use the cores... Go boot up GTA-V on mobile i7-2680qm and then boot the same game on an i5-6400...

It will run *faster* on the i5 but will still make *full use of* all 8 threads on the mobile i7 (or an FX8 chip)....

No different in FS2020 where it can *and does* make good use of the extra cores.

Fact...

"No. That's even more than a lie. You said completely opposite: "will make good use of 32GB of ram". Everyone can check that. You were unable to provide any proof and I proved that this game does NOT get any single additional FPS if RAM is more than 16 GB. So, again you're a liar."

Your right, I did say it will make good use of 32GB of system ram. That does *NOT* mean that it uses 32GB of ram, nor did I ever claim that. I specified that it regularly uses 10-16GB of ram, which on a 32GB system means that the *whole system load* is regularly 24-29GB... If that is *not* a game making good use of a 32GB ram system I dont know what is, appreantly...



"You said: "will peg out most 8GB graphics cards and makes good use of 11-16GB cards". I proved it works fine on RTX 2060.

Have you ever heard about system requirements? Look at them in the shop. You will be surprised.

And last, but not least. YOU are the only troll here."

It does. Every single link (including your BS one calling a 3800XT an R9) has shown that it regularly uses 7+GB of VRAM. Most would consider 7-7.5+ out of 8 to be pegging the cards VRAM buffer. And yes, for 11-16GB cards it makes good use of them, using at much as 9-11GB depending on settings and rez.

Again, if that is not making good use of the VRAM I must now know what that means...



"You have not been able to provide a single proof of your original words. When you were poked into your lies, you continued to lie and dodge. You're just an uneducated AMD fan who has no balls to admit that the ancient i7-7700k performs better than the Ryzen 2700 with twice as many cores and threads.
You are do ignorant than you believe that only English resources can be reputable. You cannot understand other languages and proud of that.
You can not even understand that this is international forum, not English-only.
You gave me the link for testing 4 CPUs in this game, I gave for rigorous testing of 31.
So, who of us is a troll? The answer is obvious..."

My sourecs (and yours) have backed all I have said. The only time your views are even (partially) accurate is when the game is running on all low settings at 900-1080P settings.

The OP asked what the most demanding game was. Not what the most demanding minimum requirements were...

And no, I dont think only english is relevant...

But I do think that posting a non-english source into an argument where your oponant is obviously of english speaking decent, on a forum where no one has spoek anything but english, in a thread that despite being intenational has 99% of the dicussion overall in english, is flat out rude. Period. That would never be seen as acceptable anywhere. Specially when you drop it and then expect others to understand it. What you did was both socially wrong, and frankly nothing but a troll move, but you knew that, and its why you did it.

Go home troll.