Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
this core 2 quad q6600 is not a good choice even if you build on low budget specially if i3 or i5 from 2-4 gen are super cheap aswell... 4gb of ram is also terrible if you want to do something past browsing or watching movies AND as soon as a software wants to update this pc suffocates... you can start fortnite and open your taskmanager to check yourself...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yqCCQeSIl0
i3-3225 is the min requirement for fortnite and it is a 2 core 4 thread cpu with almost double the single core performance of the q6600...
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-Core-i3-3225-vs-Intel-Core2-Quad-Q6600/1474vs1038
a decent pc for fortnite on an extrem low budget would be...
(i5 2400, gtx 750 ti, 8gb ram = -100€/$)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9vhK31WBVY
4GB still is never enough when you need a full 4-8GB of ram just for a game by itself.
4GB RAM PC = for web browser and media files. That's about it.
Maybe would run better if you stick Win7 64bit SP1 on there. No way you going to run Win10 or 11 on those specs smoothly with 4GB of RAM and run a Game that uses GPU like that.
Instead go look for a Dell OptiPlex or something similar with at least a 4th Gen i5 or i7 inside. Can get a refurbished Dell Desktop with i7-4770, 4771, 4790 with 16GB DDR3 RAM and an SSD for around $200 or less. Then can go grab Radeon 480, 570, 580 for well under $200
This would run even most modern day games just fine and smoothly at 1080p
You can even find Dell refurbished Desktops with Intel 8th Gen CPUs nowa days fairly cheap.
4GB RAM might be enough for your Tiny11 installation but it's nowhere near for games etc.
16gbs is minimum for games today, but since you're playing Fortnite you can probably get away with 8gbs. Although I don't think the rest of the PC is going to run the game well.
I suggest building a budget PC out of an old Dell Optiplex with an i7 6700. You can pair it with a GTX 1650, and it should run Fortnite pretty well.
The other specifications of the PC are nearly as powerful as it can get. The Q6600 is a legendary performer, even though there are faster Core 2 Quads in existence.
The era of computer around a Core 2 Quad is extremely bottlenecked with regards to graphics card updates, there is not much past a GTX 750 that will make any difference in performance. The PC is too slow to upgrade.
The 4GB of RAM however, is very likely upgradeable, and is likely the last and final component of the computer that is even worth upgrading at all. Modern games like Fortnite and Resident Evil 7 can utilize additional RAM beyond 2GB, and DDR2 RAM is still much faster than any SSD on the old SATA bus in a Core 2 Quad computer.
4GB of RAM is no longer enough for gaming on a modern supported operating system like Windows 11. "Tiny 11" is not supported.
Basically, you can't "test the limits of the PC" with only 4GB of RAM.
Also I would remove the long list of scam websites in your username. Deauthorize other devices, remove any API key, change your Steam password from a secure device and do a full malware scan on your machine before you get yourself phished, or the next thing you'll be posting is, "Help! All my items/Steam wallet is gone!"
Q6600 vs i7-920:
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core2-Quad-Q6600-vs-Intel-Core-i7-920/1980vs1981
GTX 750 Ti vs GTX 560 Ti:
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-560-Ti/2187vs2180
I had an EVGA GTX 560 Ti on that machine back in time which later had even run PUBG on lowest settings. Windows 10 had worked on it, loading up times of W10 was slow though, but it worked. Windows 11 might be faster also way better in performance compared to W10, but you need a W11 compatible machine for it..
Windows 11 Requirements:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/whats-new/windows-11-requirements
Windows 11 supported Intel processors:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-11-supported-intel-processors?source=recommendations
Do your brother a favour and get him a better CPU/Motherboard at least than this Q6600. If you cannot afford more than 4 GB DDR4 RAM, then create a fixed "pagefile" of "4096 MB" aka extra 4 GB VRAM via Windows' Performance settings.
There are really cheap PCs out there to gain for less than $200 if you like..
Edit_001:
I have just checked and compared the GTX 750 with today's Iris Xe Laptop integrated GPU. The Iris Xe performs way better.
GTX 750 vs Iris Xe:
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-vs-Intel-Iris-Xe/3162vsm1268515
If you are lucky, you get a factory new 15.6'' Laptop with an Intel Iris Xe GPU as well as an i5-1135G7. Works great and fast af. For example:
I had bought 2 of them for 450 EUR each, for my father and for my younger cousin and her mother 2 months ago. Cheap af.. and future-proof for Windows 11
Q6600 vs i5-1135G7:
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core2-Quad-Q6600-vs-Intel-Core-i5-1135G7/1980vsm1286124
i7-920 vs i5-1135G7:
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-920-vs-Intel-Core-i5-1135G7/1981vsm1286124
Good luck, whatever you gonna choose..
In my personal experiences of comparing various systems like a Core 2 Duo, a 3rd Gen Core i7-3770, an 11th Gen Core i7-1165G7, and a few other configurations, 50% is not a massive difference on Userbenchmark. Generally "massive" hits at around 400% and higher, imho.
It is almost an odds of even noticing a difference. 50/50 chance, over half of the population wouldn't notice a performance difference between the Q6600 and the i7-920.
A lot of that is comparing Overclocked Q6600s, so the performance difference might be a bit higher, but not earth shattering with regards to pure CPU benchmarks.
The overall system performance with faster PCI-Express buses and faster DDR RAM memory speeds makes a tremendous difference. Throughout the 90s, processor speeds raced to the "4GHz barrier", and for the last decade the rest of the PC has been playing catch up.
What I find interesting is that the Userbenchmark results indicate a lack of a "massive" 400% increase of octa-core between most of the quad-core HT and true 8-core CPUs. I suspect that their benchmark is optimized for Hyper-Threading, or that the Hyper-Threading is optimized for whatever benchmark that Userbenchmark is using.
It may be they are calibrating their results towards the still prevalent concern of single threaded performance. If there is a 100% chance of noticing a difference, what does that mean in any context?
The 300% octacore difference of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs your i7-920 is extremely telling. A worthy upgrade to either the Core 2 Quad Q6600, or the i7-920.
Game system requirements do change over time even if the store pages don't reflect this. Take CSGO for example. It's not the same CSGO is was 10+ years ago.
(On a side note: building computers does not require software knowledge at all. The hardware knowledge it requires is pretty minimal as far as I know. I might be wrong on this as I'm interested in the software side.)
well even if you upgrade to 8 gb ram and gtx 1050 you will cap at 30-40 fps with drops to like -15 fps if action happens because of the poor single core performance...
you said nothing about the motherboard you are using?