Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The panel should be pwm 0, pwm free under high sensitivity frequency.
If a panel PWM ratio of screen on/off time per duty cycle(or what we know as “hertz”) is 50:50, and they do not observe it changing(when brightness is decreased) to 40:60 , 30:70, 10:90, 5:95, etc etc ~ they will report panel as PWM 0, PWM free.
The thing is ~ as long as screen ON/OFF ratio is not 100:0, it will always consist of PWM. PWM free means ratio is always at 100:0. Thus a few reviewers are incorrect in this.
Additionally, a PWM also consist of modulation depth - which is the deviation from the mean brightness output between screen ON and screen OFF. If the total deviation (aka modulation depth %) begins with 8% (which is very high and cognitively perceivable for really sensitivity people) and they do not observe it going up to extreme values like 16%, 32% etc), they are also still going to report panel as PWM 0, PWM free.
Ipads are so complicated
it may be a high pwm freq, but it makes zero difference