Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Also if this is Starfield related, you want to go AMD.
Otherwise, I echo the recommendation of the 6700 XT. It's faster than either of them and has 12 GB RAM. It might cost a bit (~10%) more but it's worth it because you get the best (or more than the best) of both combined. You may lose out some on the typical ray tracing advantage of nVidia, but... I wouldn't put much stock in ray tracing on those two particular nVidia GPUs anyway, not with them being that low on performance/VRAM.
If you absolutely need nVidia and need ray tracing, honestly the RTX 4070 is the lowest I'd want to recommend (the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB being the absolute minimum but I feel like that's taking a poor value when the 6800 non-XT exists slightly cheaper, or the 7800 XT/6800 XT exist a bit above it), but the RTX 4070 is almost the twice the price of the two you're naming.
Nvidia is just spitting at their customers at this point (and still somehow manage to hold their position as the most popular GPU manufacturer for whatever reason), AMD at least tries to be ok-priced and Intel is trying their damnest to get their feet into gaming graphics at this point.
RX 6700XT or RX 7600 - depending on prices. At some places 6700XT costs way more than it should.
Fx-9590 ftw!
299$ is Nvidia dreaming.
YouTube is human beings doing the videos and human beings are not perfect it's closer to perfection if you test yourself.
Someone's going to mention "inflation" but I think the more proper description we start calling it by is shrinkflation, because that's what's been happening in the GPU market. Wouldn't be so bad if the two generations before also had their own setbacks (RTX 20 series was low value uplift because of price increases there too, and RTX 30 series had a mining boom skyrocket their prices as well).
That $140 in 2016 would be ~$178 today, by the way. So much for inflation. And again, that was for the GTX 1050 Ti model (the base model was $109). The "actual" x50 Ti chip this generation (called the RTX 4060 Ti) goes for up to half a thousand dollars for the 16 GB model, and only had $50 reduced from that recently.