安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
my2ct
I know a game that cannot run more than 6 cores: Prototype. It will simply crash on more than 6.
But The Witcher 2 runs perfectly fine on my system.
I'm using a GTX 1060, not AMD.
Are you in fullscreen? And what drivers you using?
Hm, maybe it was Windows 10 (haven't tried it on 11 yet) or something else with my configuration somewhere.
On the other hand, why buy a CPU with HT if all you are going to do is disable it, I remember all them early i7 users doing this and turning their CPU's into pretty much i5's with slight more cache, and the performance impact HT could have was hardly measurable anyway.
If they want to stupidly leave half their threads off the table because of a single game instead of use something like Process Lasso or a similar program that has the same core affinity feature, that's their choice.
They cant see the fake cores, Thus using more power and more heat no? Same with loads of E cores really Microsoft and Intel should have it where when you load a game the OS like Game Mode goes idle and runs on a single E core and gives the game its max boost on the minimal amount of cores the game needs.
32 threads is not for gaming 2,4,8,16 are the numbers were using from the old duals to the modern PS5 using 16 threads. So if i had an i9 i would likely run it with HT off, 16 cores boosted as high as they can go and all but a single E core disabled in bios. This would likely be the ideal setup for pure gaming on an i9 based on PS5 titles.