安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
new, as in unopened box, ie... new and not used.....
yes, you can buy new 1080ti's.
you can believe w/e you want, doesnt mean you are right...
you can buy new 1080ti's and thats a fact.
As no one could be dumb enough to believe even half the stuff he says.
0/8 bait, try better.
That you replied suggests otherwise :)
Doesn't mean I'm not right :)
replying isnt the concern, its the weak bait that is in question, go try baiting someone else into arguments.
bye...
As someone with a GTX 1060, I'm certainly not going to have it in six years, at least not as my primary graphics card if I still have it at all. Something twice as fast (like a GTX 1080 or between RTX 3050/RTX 3060 in the last generation) might be pushing it six years from now as well. I imagine age, driver support, and other intangibles (warm running, high power consumption for what is then low performance) will be bigger factors for a Pascal era graphics card as opposed to just lacking raw processing speed alone. The high end cards usually provide a decent amount of that even when they're slipping past their time, just not for the original segment of the market that would buy them to begin with. And by that point, a newer, more efficient lower end chip is often better than an aged, used, hot and energy consumer chip.
So I wouldn't say buying a used GTX 1080 would be a bad thing in any possible scenario. Maybe someone finds one for a great price or knows it will be enough for X amount of time and is fine with it. It wouldn't be my first choice even though I currently have only half the processing power, though.
In what world would someone call anyone a monster for giving something away for free!? I would like to meet this person, haha.
Too bad about my hope on GTX 1080 because they are no where to be found unless I risk getting deep on strange sources which I certainly will not or getting a used gpu...again not going happen because is uncertain the durability on used equipment in my country.
My fellow technnician person that I'm client with it for decades. Told me he recently since 2016 when he built my current machine. He now have AMD equipment and keeps repeating or insisting that these Ryzen video cards series are good for gaming. AMD processors that come along with integrated video cards are strong as well to handle games.
But I don't know I keep refusing to use AMD technology since I've been Intel and Nvidia customer for over 15 years. The prices are
I was digging the builds I've selected and came along with a few that got me interested however they always have 1-2 hardware pieces that are not so worth getting due it costs unless I build from the scratch, and only inform to tech person the references on what I want but that would still require to research for good motherboards and power supply.
One question related to Intel i5 10400f, some pointed out the definition F results to processor units that do not have video board integrated.
In my situation I've made terrible decision and meltdown my off board card after continuing to play online games under a operating system outdated with gpu drivers too old. If I had not continue to play that way my previous GTX 750 would continue to live on for a year or more.
What can you Steam users say about this particularIntel i5 10400f processor if I may not be capable to seek the so wished Intel i5 10600k with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER coming along?
I have couple choices which one of them do have this group:
It will last longer than the other two
RTX 20 series doesn't have anything really for Gaming that GTX 9 / 10 series do not if we throw Ray Tracing and DLSS aside.
Latest Drivers fully supports backwards to GTX 9 series
But yes something like GTX 1060 6GB as a bare minimum for newer games at 1080p does make sense. It can be hard to find RTX 2070 / 2080 though. You can get RTX 2060 for under $250 range; RTX 3060 12GB under $320; RTX 3060 Ti 8GB and 8GB GDDR6X variants for under $400 range. Those are prices for new+unused GPUs. You could of course find some better prices on Ebay and few other places.
Honestly if you want a GPU you buy today to have any real life for you moving forward, then I honestly would not go below a RTX 3060. Unless maybe you getting a really great deal on something like 1080 Ti / 2070 Super / 2080 / 2080 Ti
If you really want to fill a gap on a low budget, then go get a RX 580 or 590 for around $120 or less. Which will give you NVIDIA performance on-par with GTX 1070 / 1080
Did you by any chance misstyped those Radeon series? Can't find 570 nor 580 models. Only RX Radeon 5700 had a match.
Made a mistake, there are model for old type RX 570 and Radeon RX 5700.
For example:
Google > AMD RX 580 8GB
At around the time of launch RX 580 4GB or 8GB was around performance level of GTX 1060 6GB; but has surpassed that due to advances in AMD Drivers over the years. So RX 580 is more along the lines of a GTX 1070 nowa days.
Can easily find RX 580 and 590 8GB on Ebay for around $150 or less.
- AMD RX 5700 XT
- AMD Radeon™ RX 6800 XT
- Radeon™ RX 590
For now going to leave this be. By the way but is it true that Intel and AMD technology can work together without bottleneck or any other difficult? Like using Intel processors and AMD video cards or should I obey the rule to build all of the same manufacturer.