Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Flawed arguments everywhere.
thats your opinion and we all know everyone has them, doesnt mean they are facts.
1080p maybe few more years.
wrong again, 1080ti is perfectly capable of running 1080p and 1440p in all games and can push 4k easily.
I said RTX 3060 and 3060 Ti are CHEAPER and BETTER than a 1080 Ti; which if you look at benchmark comparisons; nothing but facts there.
Now if you needed a decent still relevant CUDA GPU with much more VRAM for WORK related apps/tasks; then yes maybe 1080 Ti is still a good choice.
And if the OP is not willing to go beyond like $400 USD then I highly doubt that person cares at all about 4K.
cause thats not how playing games on a pc works, no one in their right mind thinks they should be maxing out all settings in every game, sorry but again you have a horrible opinion on the topic.
a games graphics setting are there to tune the game to your standards and your hardware, not their to simply max them out.
care to? i already have and already am...