Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The operating system decides the API. For example, if a new directx 13 showed up maybe 10 series wouldn't support it.
3 years still far but I wished I could have 6 years by at minimum.
My current NVidia GTX 750 ti last untill 2021 when Nvidia antecipated to stop launching WHQL drivers.
The 1080 ti is six years old already, it was the king of the hill in 2017. But it's gonna be pretty hard up in 2029, twelve years after release. Hard to say how well it will fare. For perspective how well do the AMD 6990 or Nvidia GTX 590 fare in 2023? I mean that won't predict the future definitely, but there's a limit for how long hardware can really be serviceable too.
And while the GeForce 2070 Super has less raw power, DLSS support has some arguable benefits that may help it be more viable for the next 6 years. If you don't think DLSS is worth it, you always have AMD FideltyFX to fall back with the 1080 ti.
Still driver support for the 1080 ti will end sooner. Games won't really target for or optimize for it.
I just gave my 1080 ti away for free, either because I'm a saint or a monster depending on your values. But I am speaking as someone who actually had a 1080 ti in their possession until three days ago.
I think looking at a 3060 ti would be a reasonable consideration. A bit more performance over a 1080 ti, has newer features than the 2070 Super, is going to have longer driver support. If I was going to try and keep a card going for 6 years between a 1080 ti, 2070 Super, 3060 ti, I'd go 3060 ti.
I'l be giving a look on those series Nvidia RTX 3xxx. Any of them will or some in particular I should be looking into? And again it will depend on the estimative of value because of my tight budget.
I agree with nullable. You might want to get something newer just for future drivers. The 3060ti might give you buyer's remorse down the road when you want more VRAM. I would actually consider the rtx 3060 12g. It's slower than 3060ti but a little faster or at least equal to the 1080ti. Plus you get dlss and ray tracing.
The rtx 3060 I can actually vouche for because I'm using one right now. It handles ray tracing well. It also handles 1440p well. They are really cheap now.
But! If you don't care about Nvidia tech then feel free to explore AMDs offerings because you can get starfield premium edition for free! If you got something like the Rx 6700 XT, that has 12g VRAM and is affordable with different options and all of them come with starfield!
Failing that, the gpu won't cease to function if there are no new drivers, it just won't get any improvements or fixes, as long as it supports the games api and it has the power, it will continue to run games.
GTX 1000 probably will be fine the next 2-3 years
GTX 1600's support will end with RTX 2000
DO NOT buy ANY GTX card. Waste of time and money.
Go with AM4 B550 Motherboard and Ryzen 5600X or 5700X to save money.
2x 16GB DDR4 3200 or 3600
Another way to save money is simply buy and use SATA SSDs.
Most people will never benefit from NVME, especially most who are just doing Gaming.
You're right that most people don't need NVMe (because typical OS use and games don't really justify faster SSDs so they are a waste), but it still begs the question of if two things are similar in price, why you would choose the slower one?
If you don't have open M2 ports, sure, that's fine. SATA is usually fine, but I'd never opt for the slower thing of two comparatively priced things. The days of SATA being markedly cheaper and saving you anything substantial are long gone a couple years ago now. You're usually just getting something slower for the same price by choosing it.