Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Does help performance on weak systems though, more so with less than 4C/8T CPUs.
Using a program called NTLite (free!) I was able to disable everything I did not want and also add in the WiFi drivers for my AM5 board.
There is a good tutorial here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmGk-AAo3EQ&t=5s
My question:
Would a class-action lawsuit work against Valve Corporation for forcing us to upgrade our personal computer operating system?
AI feedback:
According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Search Engine:
A class-action lawsuit against Valve Corporation for forcing users to upgrade their personal computer operating system would likely face several challenges. It is important to note that I am an AI language model and not a legal expert, but I can provide some insights based on general knowledge.
Legal Considerations:
To determine the viability of a class-action lawsuit, several legal considerations need to be taken into account:
1. Terms of Service Agreement: When users sign up for Valve's services, they typically agree to a Terms of Service (ToS) agreement. This agreement often includes clauses regarding software updates and system requirements. If users agreed to these terms, it might be challenging to argue that Valve is forcing them to upgrade their operating systems against their will.
2. User Consent: Users have the option to decline software updates or choose not to use Valve's services altogether if they do not wish to upgrade their operating systems. The argument could be made that by continuing to use Valve's services, users are implicitly consenting to the system requirements imposed by the company.
3. Software Compatibility: Software developers often release updates to ensure compatibility with newer operating systems and take advantage of new features and technologies. If Valve's software requires specific operating system versions due to technical reasons, it may be difficult to argue that this requirement is unreasonable or unjust.
4. Consumer Protection Laws: Consumer protection laws vary by jurisdiction, and it would depend on the specific laws in place whether Valve's actions could be considered unfair or deceptive trade practices. However, it is worth noting that companies generally have the right to set system requirements for their software products.
5. Damages: To succeed in a class-action lawsuit, plaintiffs typically need to demonstrate that they have suffered harm or damages as a result of the defendant's actions. It may be challenging for plaintiffs to prove significant harm caused solely by being required to upgrade their operating systems.
Top 3 Authoritative Reference Publications or Domain Names:
1. Valve Corporation's Terms of Service Agreement: Reviewing Valve's ToS agreement would provide specific information on the terms users agree to when using their services.
2. Consumer Protection Laws in Relevant Jurisdiction: Understanding the consumer protection laws in the jurisdiction where the lawsuit would be filed is crucial to assessing the legal viability of such a case.
3. Legal Opinions and Precedents: Consulting legal experts, scholarly articles, or case law related to similar situations could provide insights into how courts have ruled on similar cases in the past.
Please note that this response is based on general legal knowledge and should not be considered as legal advice. It is always recommended to consult with a qualified attorney for specific legal concerns or questions.
They just had a major class-action lawsuit against Google for privacy violations. For the average user it's not worth entering into that as a person affected by the issue that took place. As you'd be lucky to get between approx $0.17 cents - $7 was the going average last time I checked.
Probably the only decent consumer class-action lawsuit in this industry I've seen in the past 20 years was one against ATI; for false advertising claims with regards to HDCP Compliance. That suit I took part in and the consumers won. What did we get if we qualified? A new GPU replacement, years later mind you. While that was fine I guess, I would have rather had the money.
I said it in another forum about Windows 7 losing support and I'll say it again:
Windows 7 is a 14 year old OS which was abandoned by its creators, incapable of booting on modern hardware. There are more than enough alternatives, GNU/Linux, MacOS, BSD, Windows 10/11 with some privacy hacks (though Win 10 is 8 years old already). Windows 7 had it's time to shine and this time is over.
edit:
These threads will continue until there won't be any browsers on Windows 7 which will let users access the Steam forums, because of the outdated browser.
I mean: it doesn't have to be uppermost in your mind to make you not want to install a later OS.
You can't "make" someone update his/her system. That's another waste of time: preaching to someone who doesn't want any part of it.
I said the same with Windows 7, to avoid Windows 8/10 as long as I could, and I used it right up until loss of support and then a bit beyond that.
It's three years later and it's only started losing real usability in that time. nVidia stopped supporting it with graphics drivers (has AMD or Intel?), browsers are dropping it, and now Steam. I'm expecting eventually stuff like Minecraft, League of Legends, etc. will too. It's literally dying, like all OSes do once Microsoft drops support and the user count gets so low it's worth cutting off.
Windows 10 will be usable for the foreseeable future, but not forever. This same process will begin with it starting in a couple of years.
Yup, this is true, if you insist to run Windows, you have to prepare to update eventually, it's inevitable.
I will formally update to 11 when I'm ready, not a minute before. I've run it in beta since 2 years now and it's been ready for prime time practically since day 1--albeit with some issues. This is more on principle and no one else has to agree.
I just despise Microsoft and the way it goes about things concerning YOUR property. But like Valve, ain't much you can do unless you have an alternative.
I was just saying that hitching a wagon to a particular operating system version (and this goes for outside Windows, too) isn't going to last one well in the long term.