Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
However I can easily tell you that this modern mid-range CPU can easily handle any game you throw at it.
Clock speed on modern CPUs is also a rather complicated topic, the achievable clockspeed will depend on the CPU and the environment it is running in. Temperature, power supply the amount of boosting cores etc.. all play a role in its boosting behaviour.
Your CPU can go up to 4.5Ghz under certain circumstances. These circumstances will probably look something like, no more than 1 or 2 cores at the same time, and only for a few seconds until the chip becomes too hot.
Mobile comes with its own set of constraints, and sometimes the same CPU in different devices may perform differently due to different power limits.
Unfortunately, rough generalizations is the best you cam probably make here. Going by that, and looking that model up, it's a hyper-threaded hex core (6 cores/12 threads) from the ninth generation of processors (can approximate IPC from this) and runs at up to 4.5 GHz (probably single threaded).
If a game calls for, say, a Core i7 3xx0/4xx0, for example, I'd say such a CPU will fare no worse in such cases. But an 8700K, for example (same core/thread count, same Coffee Lake generation, one generation prior, only up to 200 MHz higher boost) or an AMD close equivalent, like the Ryzen 5 3600X, for example, would both probably outperform it a fair bit. Might be more close to a non-existent 6700K/7700K with 50% more cores/threads, but even THAT is just a rough generalization at best. At the end ofthe day, a 9750H is neither a 4770K, a 7700K, a 8700K, nor a... you get the point. And comparing them gets increasingly broad the farther apart they are. So minus benchmarks, you need to approximate/guess/wing-it unless third party, anecdotal claims of "Ive tried both and had these results" are found and you trust them.
Edit: And yes, clock speed is only one single measure. Not the be all absolute measure. A 3 GHz fourth generation CPU isn't equivalent to a 9th generation 3 GHz CPU. Likewise, Intel and AMD aren't comparable there. Even within the same family, they aren't always equal (cache differences, mobile to desktop differences, etc.). But loosely, the same clock speed within a family is roughly consistent performance (at a per core level) and gets marginally faster with increasing generations.
https://i.imgur.com/tFeUIiP.png
I don't know if that's what you're looking for specifically, though. You may want to switch to "High Performance" mode in Windows/Control Panel/Power Options but be aware that this generates more heat as it runs at turbo-boost clocks. Maybe dial it back when you're finished with your game.
https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html
That's less of a concern these days as clock speeds have basically stayed the same/slowly climbed, but mobile devices usually have some lower clock speeds so if you do comparisons there, you might see cases like that and it might appear they're not good enough when they may be.
If those games that are asking for 3 GHz are listing CPUs like from the Intel 2nd through 4th generation CPUs, for example, you're fine.
I have the 8300h for my laptop and it scores this:
https://valid.x86.fr/txpa4l
It shows a multi thread and a single thread. I find the program very handy.