Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Ram: VENGEANCE® RGB PRO 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 DRAM 3600MT C18 Memory Kit — Black
Motherboard: ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero (WI-FI)
TPM 2.0 Hardware: Asus TPM-M R2.0 14-1 Pin TPM Module
Security Key: Yubico - YubiKey 5 NFC
GPU1: ASUS TUF Gaming NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GPU2: ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Super Advanced Overclocked
Monitor: ASUS VG278Q Gaming Monitor 144Hz 1ms Adaptive-Sync+FreeSync, Gsync
Sound Card: Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 Plus SABRE32-class Hi-res 32-bit/384 kHz PCIe Gaming Sound Card and DAC with Dolby Digital and DTS
PSU: EVGA 850 B5 850W 80+Bronze
Case: Corsair Icue 465X RGB Mid-Tower ATX Smart Case, Commander Pro fan and lighting controller.
I don't want to jump into the middle of this whole argument as you two seam to be battling about something, but i do want to respond to this. Many people use computers for a very long time, and unless people are overclocking or using the highest end stuff, the power they actually need is a lot less than what people actually think they need. Base line standard power profiles take a lot less power than people with high end gear and then Overclocking it.
On top of that, many people are never going to buy that top end stuff, so while the highest end GPU/CPU combo's might need a 1k watts to run. I can go build a computer right now that works very well for gaming using say a 4060 and 14400, and 64GB ram (if they like to stream and edit) and i could easily get away with a 650 watt PS and still use the factory turbo boosts, and never have a single issue. So a 650 could easily be future proof, it all depends on what your building.
I still have a DUO 8800 with a TI-550, 4GB ram and a 450 PS, that comp is closing in on 20 years old and it's still running and i do light gaming on it from time to time when i stay at my folks house. My other comp that has a 550, i could of swappped into my current comp and i still wouldn't have issues. I just got the 650 as it has a little more headroom but also it was a insane sale and i wanted a second rig, but there was no reason for me to get the bigger power supply.
the little extra headroom is nice, but my comp doesn't even come close to using the max power.
You can test draws and see what your comp is pulling. They are a nice tool to have to check everything in your house to find out where you can save on your power bill.
In a couple more years i'll be building a new comp. More than likely 2+ years way because nothing has come along (that i play) that my 10600+1060 hasn't been able to handle at 1080p. But say i wanted to upgrade now, i could easily use this PS with a 14400+4060+64GB ram it i wanted. And it will be able to do a 5060+64 or 128, and a 15 or 16 gen chip, because the lower end chips generally don't use much more than 60 watts, sometimes they are up at 120 and the lower end cards also have far less draw. So while someones idea of future proof, is a 1k watt PS, the truth is, a 550 ot 650 can be used over the course of a bunch of builds, and AMD has lower power profiles a lot anyway, so a 65 chip and a 125 GPU is a thing, when building a new comp.
Here is a power calc, for a rough idea. For some reason the one at newegg isn't loading for me, but it gives people a baseline to know what their draw is, then tack on an extra 100-150 for headroom. Add some extra power if your going to OC as well.
https://www.coolermaster.com/en-global/power-supply-calculator/