Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
It should be more than capable to push a reasonable 1080p stream without issue.
I was able to use Quicksync for streaming and capture using a 6500xt on an ancient i7-2700k 2nd gen. Worked fine. Depending on the game I saw a ~3-10fps drop with average at about 5 vs the frame rates when not recording or streaming.
For streaming specifically, the 2700k had less than ideal quality, but by 4th gen haswell the quick sync encoder was more capable and any blockiness or frame drops on the 2700k we're gone using Quicksync on a 4790k.
Even being an i3, your 10th gen should equal or better the 2nd and 4th gen Intel HD offerings.
But to answer the question, yes, you could use a 1660. Little reason to. As the upgrade vs the 1650s like 6500xt would be meh. But you could.
Better off saving for a bigger upgrade and getting OBS or similar sorted to use the iGPU.
Easily , I run a 1660ti (virtually the same as a super but about %5 faster) with a 6 core i5 9400F and 16GB DDR4 @ 2666MHz and stream a few source games such as Left 4 dead and even more modern games like RDR2 at 1080p 60 fps with not one issues or any frame rate issues / drops. The Nvenc encoder in the 16 series is ample
My CPU does not have an iGPU so If you do have an iGPU then as said above use it for encoding
Again though use software like OBS Studio or SLOBS. These apps are great for recording or live streaming. And they offer extensive options. In the options of such an app, select the INTEL GPU for encoding and see how that does.
If for some reason it doesn't fair well at 1920x1080, then try recording at 1600x900 or 1366x768 or 1280x720
Software matters here, and for the record cpu encoding is better quality than gpu encoding. At least that's the consensus. Speed is the issue though. Gpu is much faster than cpu, and to the average user the quality should be equally satisfying.
I am thinking there is a good chance your issue can be solved by trying other software/settings.
I will try to help a bit more later on but am at work now.
Let me ask, is the problem that it is choppy or that you half half the fps? Like if you got 180 fps bit it felt smooth, would you still be OK or you need the fps at 300 along with it being smooth?
"Hijacking your comment to say that people with APU's can switch to the 6500 and still use the integrated gpu for encoding in something like obs for example."
Sounds like a good idea to play with, but I don't know how to execute that because I have never had a gpu/apu system.
But yes don't buy any GPU unless you can really afford a better one worth buying.
You could try selling the RX 6500 and see how much you can fetch for it. Then put that money towards a decent NVIDIA GPU perhaps. However before you ever do that, make sure your power supply is enough for such an upgrade.