Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
I'm really thinking about getting one! This looks like an incredible value!
I imagine I'm looking more towards an RX 6800 XT, or RX 7800 (?) or RX 7700. Maybe RX 6900? Not sure.
I was hoping for some feedback on some speculation, even if it was purely a bit of guessing, on what to expect with the next likely RX 7000 GPUs (7800/7700), or if I could maybe expect some sort of official announcement from AMD on those within the next month or two. I'm not really "in-the-know" on what may be coming up in the hardware world right now.
Plus the ASUS rouge strix is a high-end model, looks absolutely gorgeous, $999 is priced well here. To me the rtx 3000 series is better.
These companies are too ambitious with their releases having unsafe power delivery and now vapor chamber issues on AMD. No thanks! I'll gladly pass this atrocious generation of overly ambitious garbage!
There's a decent chance they'll do discounts on some sites of the current generation/series once the new lineup comes out as well. Sometimes they even do surprise price drops (rare, but can be a BIG difference) for 'older' amd equipment.
As for the GPU dilemma, I'm in a similar situation. You may even remember me talking about wanting to upgrade but not wanting to upgrade to. I've pretty much settled on Ryzen 7900x system, but now have a hard choice of what to do with my GPU.
I have a 2070 and my options are mainly these....
1. Keep the 2070 with my 7900x which would be ok since I still have a 1080p monitor and play practically no new games. Only drawback is that I'd hate a confused feeling of where my system sites in strength with a very strong CPU and a low-midrange budget card at this point.
2. Get a medium tier card now like a 6800 or a 3070 ti but then I'd still feel like my system is unbalanced and at the point I want to upgrade to 1440p (which will probably be soon) I may be left a bit underwhelmed at the performance and would want to get a new GPU but then I'm stuck with the one I just bought (I don't sell my old stuff so it would be wasted parts/money to me).
3. Invest and get a high end card to match my high end CPU but those GPU's really aren't worth it because the higher the price only slightly higher performance.
4. Just stick with what I have now and keep waiting. (I don't want to wait for the free 32 GB of ram promotion to go away), it's not often I see that happen and to pass on it would basically be throwint $175 in the garbage because then I would have to pay for that ram in the future.
I liked the idea of 7900 XT for $899 but to find out it still isn't on par with Nvidia gpus when it comes to raytracing would mean it's not that good a deal. You're paying less because you're getting less raytracing wise which is becoming a big deal nowadays even if it's just for "getting you feet wet" purposes.
I'm considering a 6800 because for the price it seems the best option but if it's lacking in raytracing it kind of voids my logic of not buying a high end AMD because it lacks good raytracing when here I am buying a 6800 which isn't very strong at raytracing.
I was considering just getting a 3070 which would sit somewhere in the middle because of lack of good options and it would still probably be good enough for me.
So that's where I'm at really right now. I have my main system pretty much picked out but no GPU's I want to jump on, and I don't like the idea of building most of a system right now then finishing it later. I want it all at once. Not sure how I want to do this. I'm also not on a firm budget. I'll spend a lot of it was worth it, but seems right now it's not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26Lxydc-3K8
Also, and I probably should have mentioned this in the first post, but nVidia's recent stinginess with VRAM is a drawback. I'm often exhausting the 6 GB on my GTX 1060 more and more, so something with just 8 GB half a dozen years after I got it, and needing to last many more from here on out, won't do. Something with at least double digit GB VRAM with highly be preferred, ideally something like 16 GB rather than just 10 GB or 12 GB or whatever (though I could probably make do with the latter if need be). These are rather regular occurrences...
https://imgur.com/a/nM3nkMM
Granted, that's down to running not only Java Minecraft but shaders on top of them, with are not efficient at all, but... nothing I can do about that.
I'm guessing you don't have another GPU with more memory lying around to test with.
At the least, I imagine an AMD option will be the better price to performance and VRAM proposition. But if it DOES turn out to be this, it least makes nVidia an option IF come buy time for me (still a month or three away), they have a better option. I'm doubting it since we sort of know some about the RTX 4070 Ti, but that's why i was asking about the RX 7800/7700 information. They might only barely be better.
Yeah, I do, but I thought you already upgraded.
With me being on a GTX 1060, almost anything should be a vast improvement.
For your situation, do you need the 7900X? Don't you have an AM4 platform now? I'd sit on that and wait for the 3D cache AM5 CPUs, and upgrade the GPU before then (or at the same time if your RTX 2070 is enough for now). I think buying into Zen 4 now would be like buying into Zen 3 at first; that is, not so great a price for performance proposition that will soon be humiliated by later releases on the same platform. But to be fair, I think even then it will be expensive since the problem is partly DDR5, not just CPU pricing.
I want to skip that and move to a 5800X3D badly, but... GPU is a priority for me.
I don't need the 7900x. I just kind of want it maybe so my brain thinks "7900x + 7900xt must be a winner system" lol. I don't know. I probably will end up waiting GPU wise. I was (and still am) actually just considering waiting on just my GPU. I will end up getting a 1000 watt PSU to be prepared for anything coming up. I might even still keep my 3700x but I'm trying not to because of the free ram. If it wasn't for the free ram I wouldn't be so eager to buy. Well plus I hate this motherboard lol. Otherwise I would have probably just gotten a 5900x by itself and popped it into this current system.
For all I know, it could be trying to write more than the GPU can handle, like not just VRAM-wise but TOTAL-wise, which in my case is 38 GB (!) because of some bug. Alternatively, if it's just the 6 GB it's exhausting, it's still crashing when it shouldn't and adding more VRAM is a bandage that could soon be worn through, so to speak. And i watched VRAM use and in the older version (the one that is crashing), it never goes as high as in the newer version, so it seems like it might not even be USING that much but is just... having some issue. I think it might be tied to changing full screen to window or vice versa, or minimizing or vice versa. No Minecraft crash logs, strangely, and the last thing in the game log just says...
[09:00:54] [Client thread/INFO]: [Shaders] Framebuffer created.
And then it fails.
One reply I found on Reddit had a former AMD GPU user who had no issues move to nVidia and start having said issue. So anecdotally, it seems AMD is free of at least that one particular issue (out of who knows how many possible).
Have you tried allocating more system memory to Minecraft? I really would like to help fix that since it doesn't seem right at all for you to be forced to upgrade/get a new GPU simply because of that error, especially if it's fixable.
JVM allocation probably isn't related but I can't personally claim that for absolute sure. But I'm reallllly thinking it's not. I already allocate 4 GB and don't use all that so I doubt that is what's running out (seems to be GPU VRAM instead). And besides, allocating too much does nothing at best, and hurts performance at worst, because then the garbage collector might decide it has to run less frequently, but will be dealing with bigger amounts of data when it does, and the garbage collector running is a rather important source of stutters in Minecraft. Would also accelerate "real" RAM use because actual use is often near twice what the JVM itself uses (plus committed above that, as I found out the hard way when I disabled my page file years ago).
It's an old myth that allocating more RAM helps. It can, but it only does if your current allocation is too little to begin with (which sometimes is the case with Mojang set defaults, but I use above those already). Everything indicated this is VRAM/GPU driver related, not JVM allocation.
I don't see either as a bad option. More of a question when you want an upgrade. Future will hold better deals for more performance at some point. Still, that's no reason to hold back, if need is there right now.