Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
Der Ersteller dieses Themas hat einen Beitrag als Antwort auf seine Frage markiert.
Diskussionsregeln
Diesen Beitrag melden
https://youtu.be/qACIqmP8xgw?t=687
The first is to stay with what you have if you don't think it's limiting you enough to be an issue. Based on your own checking, this seems to be the case.
The second is to upgrade if you do think it's holding you back. However, if you do, I'd suggest the 5800X3D over the 5900X for around the same cost (or a little less, even). There's no point to a 5900X for gaming because either the 5700X would a better choice than the 5900X because it's the same (basically) performance level (just less cores, which... don't matter for gaming) at a lower price, or the 5800X3D is better performance for the same cost. As it is, even the modern Core i5s/Ryzen 5s are enough core/thread-wise for gaming, and a 5600X would vastly outperform your 1700X (it even outperforms my 3700X). Going two steps beyond that and neglecting to instead go up in per core performance is choosing the lesser priority IMO. If you're doubting the uplift from the cache (sometimes it doesn't add much or anything), then the 5700X still makes more sense for being cheaper and still more than enough.
I could be wrong and maybe you have a use for the extra cores. I'm sort of going out on a limb and presuming you don't because anyone who does would honestly know they do, and wouldn't even be asking if a 1700X to 5900X upgrade is worthwhile for highly parallelized use-cases. They would know it and would just be making the change without asking.
To summarize, if you upgrade, I'd either go with the 5700X (same performance as the 5900X you were looking at, but cheaper) or 5800X3D (better performance than the 5900X you were looking at for the same cost, and best per-core performance on AM4). Your other choice is to stay with your 1700X. While newer options on AM4 can be up to VASTLY faster than your present CPU, you do make the most justification out of any purchase simply by using it as long as it's suitable. And you make it sound like your 1700X might be for you.
Some games would probably double the frame rate, but it all depends.
Ah, I see you have a similar monitor as mine, a 49" 3840x1080 Samsung, then I'd say you might see an uplift in framerate at this res, but not as much as at 1080, at 3840x1080, your GPU may be the one being somewhat stressed.
Seeing this, I'd say that IF you present CPU is giving you a smooth gameplay experience with the RTX 3080, then I see no reason to upgrade. Upgrade only IF you need higher framerate with a more powerful GPU, like the RTX 4080/4090.
I was like you, pretty contented with my R9 3900X + RX 6900 XT at same res as you (high five!), but I knew I'd be getting an RX 7900 XTX (yes, something of an AMD fanatic). So, with that in mind, I went with a 5900X (only because one landed on my lap at much lower cost than a 5800X3D) to go with the XTX I've gotten. The 3900X isn't gonna be wasted, or sold, I've decided to build a 2nd gaming rig with it and the RX 6900 XT.
This is what I got from a 3700x and I noticed more smoothness in CPU hungry games
Also, I'd be a little concerned about plunking in a 16C/32T beast like the 5950X since he's on an older X370 chipset mobo...I'm not sure if the power delivery of that board can handle such a beast. However, .I'd feel more confident IF he had had a B550 mobo at the very least.
Otherwise, newer CPUs are vastly faster, will give you significantly more fps.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_KqDfW8yzQ
What is wrong? You have a different cpu with fewer cores and threads, also play "specific games" . And with pretty different profile than what OP mentions. Care to read the aim of the thread and try to give some relevant help?
If you do have a first gen Ryzen board like the x370 or b350, you should make sure the board has a bios update that will work with the 5900x, there are some first Gen Ryzen boards that are not and will not be compatible still with Ryzen 5000 series.
This video here shows pretty much what will happen in most games. If playing at 1080p, you would see significant FPS increase in pretty much all games. If playing at 1440p, it all depends on the game. If the game is CPU intensive, you will see some performance increase. If the game is more GPU bound, the increase will be less significant. And in pretty much all games at 4K, you will see minimal increase in performance, if any at all. At 4K, you are heavily GPU bound, and CPU matters much less.
So, it is probably a good idea to mention what resolution you are playing at. Resolution is very important when determining CPU performance. Especially when deciding if spending hundreds on a CPU is worth the upgrade.
But since you only have a 1700x(first gen Ryzen) with a 3080, I would say that upgrading to a Zen 3 CPU would be a vast improvement. And well worth it. No matter resolution you are playing at. But again, if playing at 4K, the performance increase would be very minimal.