安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題的作者已將一篇留言標為問題解答。
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
IF something's completely new like the 12VHPWR connectors, one can't be sure if a proper or well seated connection had been made. Unlike the trusty old 6/8pin PCIe connector, I know when I'd properly seated the plug because it's easy to see.
My point is, it's easy to blame or criticize the alleged inadequacies of others behind the keyboard....even I, IF I had gotten the RTX 4090, can't say for sure I'd not make the same mistake, and this from a guy with at least 20 years of building my own rigs.
Why I say better now? Because I have an RX 5700 XT which would at random times be a bit problematic but overall none of my other AMD cards have caused me much trouble.
New or not the 12VHPWR connector has the same retention mechanism as basically every other power cable in your pc. You fully seat the plug and the little hook locks it into place. If you are unsure give the plug a little wiggle and tug, if it backs out it wasn't fully seated. It's not rocket science. The fact that there were only about 50 cases of melted connectors world wide out of hundreds of thousands of units sold would point to the cable not being the issue. The "easy to short" adapter that numerous tech outlets couldn't get to melt even when they specifically tried to isn't the problem, dumb people are.
The only issue I had with my RX 6600 XT out of the box was that it wouldn't run my UHD tv's native res. Turns out it was an EDID issue with the tv.
Yeah was totally not a story blown out of proportion by people like you.
Nvidia runs faster.
Nvidia runs cooler.
Nvidia runs on less power.
Nvidia runs on solid drivers from day 1.
Nvidia runs all applications that you might want to run on your gpu.
AMD is cheap.
edit: oh look, more things to think about...
https://www.extremetech.com/gaming/341749-amd-investigating-overheating-radeon-7900-reference-boards
This is exactly the sort of fallacy people fall for. nVidia has a product at the top of the stack that's above AMD's best, and people presume nVidia is better at everything all the way down.
In reality, it's pretty much if you're not after the best performance, of which the RTX 4090 provides, AMD has a better performance for price. Unless you have a reason to go for nVidia (these DO exist, like encoding, professional work, or some situation where nVidia just gives better results), then there's little reason to go for nVidia right now, ESPECIALLY at the low to mid range where MOST people (just not people on these forums) are at.
Power use and heat are variable. Sometimes nVidia is worse and sometimes AMD is here. In reality, again, few people will swing a buying option over this. The evidence is all the nVidia people saying "who cares, I can't even see a real difference in my utility bill" at the time nVidia is worse here.
As for drivers, ohhhhh no honey. I am not going to sit here and say AMD has no issues as I haven't had them since they were ATI. But I can tell you that during the times of my GTX 560 Ti and GTX 1060 6 GB, I've either experienced or seen enough to know nVidia is NOT perfect from day one. For goodness sake, look at the Minecraft reddit or OptiFine reddit or PCMasterRace reddit even and there's enough repeated posts about older versions of Minecraft just visually breaking, either standard or with shaders, because of nVidia's drivers. Anti-aliasing through the control panel hasn't worked right since after 373.06. Resident Evil 2 2019 has (or had) nVidia known issues. Modern Warfare (or whatever Call of Duty is called now, I'm not a fan of it) apparently recently had some. Recent drivers had people complaining about frequencies not dropping under idle situations even with "prefer maximum performance" not chosen. I could go on. So, please, AMD might be worse (not saying they are, just entertaining the idea that they may be) but let's not pretend nVidia is without a plethora of issues too.
By the way, I prefer nVidia hardware-wise.
Nvidia has their fair share of issues as well, I got a a list of both the the issues my 6800xt had and my current 3080ti has had, The problem with Nvidia though is they don't care to listen to feedback, so if you have a problem related to your setup with their drivers, that problem can hang around for a long time, AMD does seem to take feedback from its community and they do usually improve on it, I just wish AMD would get rid of their clunky gamer style, hard to navigate control panel.
A few others who have commented seemed like they gave "better answers" because they do have recent experience with AMD GPU drivers.
Yeah ok. You knew the answer and that's why you made a thread asking the question. lol.
As for the rest, hey, to each their own. I've given my opinion, if you wish to ignore it. You're perfectly free to do so. Mostly what I see in rebuttal is whataboutism's and straight up denial of reality, but if that does it for you, then great. Both of those things are quite popular these days. ;)
Yes, there'll be some with bad experience, both AMD and nVidia, and I've noticed that for those who've had issues, they can be quite vocal about it. Your comments sounds amicable at a glance, but that part about 'whataboutism's and straight up denial of reality' tells me you're being disingenuous.
I gave a general answer. "No."
Did they work on day 1? No? Oh they still have issues even now? Ok then, glad we are keeping track.
If you want another "generalised answer" here you go:
"In the last 20+ years, it's been Nvidia #1 and AMD #2. There have been a few exceptions along the way, but overall, that's how the chips fall."
..and this is how it currently stands, as it usually does. There are of course reasons, but OP didn't ask for those. Apparently this entire post was troll bait, as OP himself just admitted.
The first claim, the bit about whatabout-ism, isn't even applicable to what I said. You implied nVidia has solid drivers throughout, and I was giving just a few examples that they always aren't. Contrasting your claim isn't whatabout-ism.
The second, denying reality, is perhaps being done, but by you. Instead of even considering that I brought examples against your claim, you choose to label it as something it's not to make it easier for you to ignore. Which is kind of confusing, because it's not like what I said couldn't be challenged properly. I don't have experience with AMD's drivers, and admitted as much, so I couldn't "defend them". You had a viable response to merely list examples of your own where you had bad experiences with AMD's drivers (even if that would have been "whatabout-ism" in response my claim, ironically enough), and that would have been answering OP's original question as well if you did so.
OP probably isn't after an nVidia versus AMD discussion for the sole purpose of mocking those who prefer nVidia. OP was asking specifically about opinions on AMD's drivers. Yes, you gave your opinion on that too, but by encompassing it with the narrative that nVidia is near flawless at drivers (they aren't) along with a laundry list of reasons why nVidia is better (some of which also aren't true to the extent you stated), which is simply out of place since the thread wasn't asking for brand preference.
I'm sure certain posters here would gleefully encourage that line of thought. But instead of blaming AMD and their 'crap' driver, he'd asked around, and someone suggested the he reset the BIOS setting, and he did, he'd also tweaked the BIOS setting (he'd admitted he'd messed with it previously) and hey Presto! His card is performing as should! It's good to see that some are actually asking around for solution, instead of jumping on a certain "AMD Sux" bandwagon.