安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Oh, I wasn't saying a single game (which is really just a tech demo of an older game at that) justifies getting the card. Lord knows the entire tech demo is a glorified advertisement for their 4090 anyway (what with little 4090s sprinkled throughout the levels). I'm just pointing out that the fact it's the only card capable of managing path tracing at playable frames means that going forward, any games taking more advantage of raytracing makes the 4090 a good contender. But it's also up there in terms of enthusiast prices, which doesn't really make it a good deal for anyone who games midrange (1080P or 1440P and not 4K).
The 1650 was never meant to replace the 1060. That's what the 2060 is for.
So if anything you need to look at a 1660 like a form of 2050, and the 1650 like a 2030 or 2040.
I have a 1070 and 1080; no 1660 ever made comes close to either of those.
Overall, I stuck with a 1080 Ti as long as I could. While I do own a 2080 Super, I waited a while to move towards the RTX cards. Because the RTX was not the kind of a step up like we've seen in the past due to major changes in design and function. 1080 Ti is still fine for non-RT/DLSS stuff. I didn't really need anything better until I realized what I could do with the 3080 and 3080 Ti. I didn't see the point in paying $2000+ for a 3090 though (back in 2021)
It'd be one thing if it were a lot cheaper, but it's not. It's literally a scam by NVIDIA's part, they silently launched it through less popular AIBs. By your own definition of a scam, people would mistakenly buy one of those cards thinking they'll get the same performance as the 12GB model because all other specs are the same aside from the VRAM capacity and the bus width.
The real problem is the memory bandwidth
You can use a 32 bits data bus for either one module or two modules (clamshell configuration).
The 3060 is a clamshell configuration; they reduced the amount of modules, therefore the bus width has been reduced.
Of course, the implification of such a reduction in memory is not something a consumer can be asked to know, or even understand. It's a good thing, benchmarking outlets point the finger towards it.
But I struggle to understand the outcry from non-tech savvy guys;
"embracing 256 bit"? What does that even mean?
Reason why nGreedia can do this is simple, sheep will always be sheep, that are led to slaughter.....basically, nGreedia fans would lap it up regardless. Nobody can argue that asking price for an RTX 3060 is higher than the RTX 3050 Ti from same company and nomenclature.
What I don't understand is why even treat your customers like this? Nvidia has an 80% market share. Their customers have always been loyal, some would say to the point of fanaticism, but still. Enthusiasts rarely flinch at the flagship prices, so it's not like Nvidia ever struggles to move their high end stock. The debacle with the 4080 is only because the card is underspeced and overpriced.
But that's exactly the problem now with the 3060 as well. Even airline companies don't have THIS much contempt for their customers. Especially not the ones who actually pay well. Sure, economy class get treated like ♥♥♥♥, but they also pay the cheapest tickets, which are actually advertised as cheap, as is the service.
So at least you know what you're getting. And they rarely treat their business or 1st class customers like crap. Nvidia lately seems to gladly take a ♥♥♥♥ on their low range/mid range AND enthusiast customers. The kind of behavior that can only be exemplified by a MONOPOLY because they figure you don't have a choice anyway, so they can treat you like crap and you'll take it.
Better yet look at the Memory Throughput via the GB/s as well as Texture Fill Rates and such. Those #s are much more important then the bitrate alone; 192 vs 256 vs 384
The memory bandwidth of current 3060, 3060 Ti and 3070 are all fairly close to one another.
NVIDIA will soon be replacing the current 3060 Ti with refreshed ones that have GDDR6X instead of just GDDR6. This will further help that lineup with better memory throughout at the same bitrate, and since the old ones will be not produced any longer, the newer refreshed 3060 Ti GDDR6X should go for around the same prices as currently see which is around 399-499 $USD or so.
Take a look at this 1080 Ti vs 3060 Ti games comparison.
https://youtu.be/TphV6mL-WJw