Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Because durability is the main thing seperating the two mice that he mentioned. Both are about as accurate, responsive and comfortable as the other. But the Rival 300 is much better built and much more reliable and durable than the Deathadder. Razer products are infamous for breaking through normal use - what would the point be if OP bought a mouse that broke almost instantly?
The first thing to do when buying a mouse is to feel it and test it, make sure you're comfortable with it. Why would you bring up it's durability? SS rivals and Razer deathadder are top build with quality materials. We're not talking about cheap $10 mouse here kid.
This ^.
Since it was a fairly long post, I'll just link it: http://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/11/135508833657487437/?tscn=1487074420
TL;DR:
Razer's switches for their mice is rather flimsy. They will start getting issues after a few months of usage.
Also, most CS:GO Pro Players don't use Razer. You're simply fooled by smart marketing that Razer does. Majority of them use either Zowie or SteelSeries.
You can check out what the Pros use on the following links:
And you can't tell the difference between polling rate, 1Hz is 1Hz whether you are using a Razer or a SteelSeries mouse. There might be a chance that if you installed the mouse, the default polling rate setting would've been higher, but you can change that to 1Hz from the software, not much of a big deal.
Edit: Just realized this is a thread from 2016. Good job whoever bumped it.
https://insider.razerzone.com/index.php?threads/roughly-how-long-does-the-deathadder-chroma-last.17674/
People are different and they won't use the mouse the same way too obviously. I had to change mouses occasionally because i click the mouse button hard enough like tapping on to something to make sure i hit the right one in competitive game. You feel me? If you're like me, then i will believe you that you used Razer products and had to change to another brand because of it's durability. I was using the blackwidow chroma for like a year and had to change to MX cherry blue switches because i think it's better. It's just a matter of personal preference. It's not like you're a pro and getting sponsorships.
I don't know about you, but I've been extensively using Razer Products since the days of the Lachesis(2007). That mouse still works for me, minus the right click which died 2 years ago. I switched to a DA2013 after that and since then I've had nothing but issues with Razer.
I'm not saying EVERYONE has issues with DeathAdder. But simply the amount of people who report issues with Razer is alarmingly higher compared to other established brand such as SteelSeries.
Durability is an ABSOLUTELY important metric to judge a mouse. It is an essential peripheral that will be used extensively on a daily basis. It should absolutely be durable and be able to survive for as long as possible.
Besides, people come here to get opinions and experiences from others who have used the same products. So in case if someone had a bad experience with a certain product they are bound to mention it and warn regarding. And usually the negative experience bit comes from the product being inferior in build quality and longevity. So instead of brown-nosing a certain company and touting your own positive experience with aforementioned product, you should actually take a look at how many people are having real issues with the core functionality of Razer mice compared to those reporting for other brands.
Since you mentioned side-grips in a attempt to drag down the Rival 300, let me use a relevant analogy:
Say, I have 2 cars. X & Y. I drive each car for 100kms(or whatever that is in miles) on an alternate basis from point A to B. I take same care with both. One year later, car X shows signs of significant interior-degradation compared to car Y. However, at the same time, car Y has serious issues with its engine and core components compared to car X.
In this case, which would be the more durable car? The one than still has a functioning & running engine, or the one that looks better from the inside, but doesn't even start?
Think over it and do whatever you want to after that.
And well... bye. No point in dragging a thread from 2016.
We're not talking about cheap mouse here bro. $30 ain't cheap but still affordable. I don't think it's wrong to spend another $30 if you're looking for a quality time. Lol.
Bro, I used to use only Razer. Every single one I ever owned started having microswitch problems after a year or two of hardcore gaming use. I ended up going through so many Razer mice over the years I've lost count. None of the optics died, it was always the micro switches. Now I have a ROG Gladius, which has all the exact same benefits of a Razer AND easily replaceable micro switches. Changing the switches doesn't even void the warranty!