Which choice is better for a gaming monitor a FHD 144hz 1ms or UHD 60Hz 1ms ?

[Thuunder Good]

Hey guys I'm looking to buy a monitor for my gaming PC but I'm little confused about the monitor I want to buy, I have budget of 750 USD please help me by suggesting a good gaming monitor.

[John Doe]

It's like V-Sync, limiting the frames to the monitor's refresh rate so that you don't see flickering on your screen, but monitor-based, in a better form than V-Sync.

[Thuunder Good]

Thanks guys for your help I think I would go for a QHD with 144hz and 1ms. THANKS

[Azza ☠]

For gaming purposes, you would be better off with 144Hz or 165Hz @ 1440p resolution with G-SYNC.

G-SYNC would sync your monitor with a Nvidia graphics cards output, rather than capping it. So you can use the range of 30 to 165 FPS, rather than V-SYNC capping at 30, 60, 120, or uncapped with possible screen tearing and stuttering.

Some things to look out for...

- IPS Panel vs TN Panel (IPS will be brighter, richer colours, and better viewing angles - TN Panels are faster response, but IPS is catching up to speed too)

- Refresh rate (120/144Hz or 165Hz is better off with G-SYNC if Nvidia or FreeSYNC if AMD)

- Response time (5ms or less)

- Input lag (hard to calculate, but gives you a truer result, lower is better - it's the time that it takes to go from PC > Cable > Monitor > Pixel change)


Highly recommend:

Acer Predator XB271HU
https://www.amazon.com/Acer-Predator-XB271HU-27-inch-Widescreen/dp/B0173PEX20

or

Asus ROG Swift PG279Q
https://www.amazon.com/SWIFT-PG279Q-Screen-LED-Lit-Monitor/dp/B017EVR2VM

[John Doe]

rowdycat a écrit :

FHD 144hz 1ms !!! Better.

UHD 60Hz 1ms ? Why do you need a ultra fast 1 ms when you have only 60 Hz?
No retorical question, I'm really interested.

When you sit in front of a screen with UHD, less than 2m, do you really can recognize the full resolution. If yes you have a VERY very sharp eye ;-)

Now another option: You buy a UHD with a huge screen so that you are able to "use" this resolution. And you still are less than 2m in front of your screen.
You have another problem. The screen is too big and you have to move your eyes and head all time.

A lot have moved from FHD to higher resolutions, it's not anything to glorify...

and yes, I CAN "recognize" how my 32 inch 4k BDM3275 looks. I can go downstairs to my mom's Philips 32 inch TV, and the difference from it to this is day and night.

You don't NEED to buy a giant panel to "use" that resolution. It's called having a higher pixel pitch so that you get better IQ. Why do you think there are lots of ultrabooks out there with very high resolutions? Higher PPI = higher image quality. Or else they wouldn't exist.

[John Doe]

rowdycat a écrit :

- Because all things have to be "improved". Giving new arguments to buy sth. Let's higher the numbers! Another buy arguments are difficult to communicate. For example the "tearing" effect.

Can you recognize the difference between 320 kbs mp3 and 192 kbs mp3?
Sound cards are a perfect example that the human ear has its limits.
Your eyes have limits, too.
Tech specifications can easily be better than your own senses.

Sorry to disappoint you, but when I'm in tech markets, I can tell the difference from an ultrabook that has a 3800x screen to one that has a FHD screen. It certainly looks sharper. It's something you can tell, and no, you don't have a grasp of idea about what the "limits" of the human eye are.

The human organs aren't things you can benchmark.

Your argument is really nonsensical.

[John Doe]

rowdycat a écrit :

"The human organs aren't things you can benchmark."
Who's talking about benchmarks? I have an eye with 20 megapixel?!
Find someone who can recognize a movement over 200 Hz.

These nonsensical arguments will get you nowhere. First off, you need to find a monitor capable of over 200 HZ. It's known that things get more fluid frame after frame. Your eyes do not see the World in frames per second, and you're jumping from one topic to another. First, you talked about the quality of MP3s, then you got to the differences in resolution and now you're talking about different HZ. Really, are you sane?

[Thuunder Good]

Please guys don't argue each other, I have made this discussion so I can get a better gaming monitor within my range so please be polite : D