dirthurts 16. mai 2016 kl. 17.57
AMD FX 8320 to Intel i5 6600k upgrade worth the effort?
I'm kicking an r9 390 right now (8gb) and I'm considering an upgrade to an i5 for better performance (and mobo, keeping my ddr3 16gb though). I'm clocked at 3.8 ghz now...
My question is, with DX12 rolling in and the AMD processors getting some solid gains from the extra cores, is it worth upgrading to the i5?
How much of a bump and I'm looking at here?
Any thoughts?
< >
Viser 115 av 19 kommentarer
M.A.F.I.A Cannoli 16. mai 2016 kl. 18.04 
Nope not worth it
Mozendo 16. mai 2016 kl. 18.50 
If you're not going to upgrade your RAM then don't upgrade to a 6600k, DDR3 isn't recommend for Skylake and it's harmful to it.
MrMcSwifty 16. mai 2016 kl. 20.10 
What kinds of games do you play?
_I_ 16. mai 2016 kl. 20.16 
for gaming, yes

nearly twice the core performance, where it counts in gaming
MrMcSwifty 16. mai 2016 kl. 20.25 
Opprinnelig skrevet av _I_:
nearly twice the core performance, where it counts in gaming

Does not always equate to 2x the performance in games.

The type of games he plays is relevant.
ee 16. mai 2016 kl. 20.27 
I doubt it. Is there a particular game you're thinking of where the performance is lagging? If there are some single/dbl thread games that require more oomph you can turn or 2 or 4 of the cores and massivey OC the 8320; esp if you have a good cooling solution.
_I_ 16. mai 2016 kl. 20.32 
Opprinnelig skrevet av McSwifty:
Opprinnelig skrevet av _I_:
nearly twice the core performance, where it counts in gaming

Does not always equate to 2x the performance in games.

The type of games he plays is relevant.
with a gpu thats being held back by the fx cpu, it can

Opprinnelig skrevet av ee:
I doubt it. Is there a particular game you're thinking of where the performance is lagging? If there are some single/dbl thread games that require more oomph you can turn or 2 or 4 of the cores and massivey OC the 8320; esp if you have a good cooling solution.

we also need to know what mobo the op has before suggesting to overclock
Sist redigert av _I_; 16. mai 2016 kl. 20.33
MrMcSwifty 16. mai 2016 kl. 20.39 
Opprinnelig skrevet av _I_:
with a gpu thats being held back by the fx cpu, it can

Sure, it can.

Usually doesn't. Depends on what he's playing.

If he's playing a lot of MMOs, Civ5, Arma III, etc, then you're probably right.
M.A.F.I.A Cannoli 16. mai 2016 kl. 20.54 
Disinfo.... yeah FX holds back GPUS, dunno, no fps dips here....
MrMcSwifty 16. mai 2016 kl. 21.08 
Opprinnelig skrevet av Grey Angel:
Disinfo.... yeah FX holds back GPUS, dunno, no fps dips here....

It's not wrong to say a FX can hold back some GPUs. They definitely can. How much so, and whether the upgrade is worthwhile, depends on many factors. It's not as cut and dry as _I_ likes to make it seem. If he plays mostly FPS, for example, the upgrade would be mostly worthless, since the 8320 can run pretty much any FPS at 60+ fps.
vadim 16. mai 2016 kl. 21.39 
Opprinnelig skrevet av dirthurts:
My question is, with DX12 rolling in and the AMD processors getting some solid gains from the extra cores, is it worth upgrading to the i5?
No doubts, its worth to upgrade. And don't bother about DX12.
First, i5 have exactly the same number of physical cores as FX-8/9xxx.
Second, expectations from DirectX12 most probably overrated.
Third, nobody knows atm, whether DirectX12 will become popular or not. It can lose to Vulkan.
M.A.F.I.A Cannoli 16. mai 2016 kl. 22.07 
Opprinnelig skrevet av vadim:
Opprinnelig skrevet av dirthurts:
My question is, with DX12 rolling in and the AMD processors getting some solid gains from the extra cores, is it worth upgrading to the i5?

First, i5 have exactly the same number of physical cores as FX-8/9xxx.

Correction FX have 2 FPUs per core
vadim 16. mai 2016 kl. 22.09 
Opprinnelig skrevet av Grey Angel:
Correction FX have 2 FPUs per core
What do you mean by that? Can you explain your statement more clear? And what is FPU from your point of view?
_I_ 16. mai 2016 kl. 22.15 
each fx module has 2 cores sharing l2 cache and a single fpu
fx8-9 have 4 modules
fx6 has 3 of 4 modules enabled
fx4 has 2 of 4 modules enabled

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/AMD_Bulldozer_block_diagram_%288_core_CPU%29.PNG

Sist redigert av _I_; 16. mai 2016 kl. 22.21
vadim 16. mai 2016 kl. 22.26 
Probably he misused term "FPU" instead of "floating-point capable execution unit". In such case, he is right - FX really has 2 ALUs for floating point operations per core (module). But Core i has 4 such EUs
< >
Viser 115 av 19 kommentarer
Per side: 1530 50

Dato lagt ut: 16. mai 2016 kl. 17.57
Innlegg: 19