Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
nearly twice the core performance, where it counts in gaming
Does not always equate to 2x the performance in games.
The type of games he plays is relevant.
we also need to know what mobo the op has before suggesting to overclock
Sure, it can.
Usually doesn't. Depends on what he's playing.
If he's playing a lot of MMOs, Civ5, Arma III, etc, then you're probably right.
It's not wrong to say a FX can hold back some GPUs. They definitely can. How much so, and whether the upgrade is worthwhile, depends on many factors. It's not as cut and dry as _I_ likes to make it seem. If he plays mostly FPS, for example, the upgrade would be mostly worthless, since the 8320 can run pretty much any FPS at 60+ fps.
First, i5 have exactly the same number of physical cores as FX-8/9xxx.
Second, expectations from DirectX12 most probably overrated.
Third, nobody knows atm, whether DirectX12 will become popular or not. It can lose to Vulkan.
Correction FX have 2 FPUs per core
fx8-9 have 4 modules
fx6 has 3 of 4 modules enabled
fx4 has 2 of 4 modules enabled
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/AMD_Bulldozer_block_diagram_%288_core_CPU%29.PNG