Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
Depending on the game to how well it will perform. You still benefit, but probably not to the max performance it can go.
I'm guessing the GTX 980 in question is used?
It's a beast for 1440p resolution at very high to ultra settings.
You can still keep it for future builds/upgrades too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgmKb-tIxoI
these are with a gtx 980 notice the gpu usage in the videos the fx-8350 is equivalent to i5 4460 in newer games and contrary to the intel gurus will not bottleneck even a gtx 970 or 390 as some have stated
Under certain circumstances at lower resolutions you might get better results with a Intel i7. This has a lot to do with coding optimiztions favoring Intel for more FPS (as shown when resolutions are raised and FX 8350 framerates remain pretty steady while Intel drops much more until FX 8350 is outperforming i7 quadcore at 4K in a lot of situations) rather than the technical prowess of either CPU. However the FX 8350 should be enough to keep it over 60 FPS at 1080p and higher resolutions in most cases and certainly playable in any case. It will still be better than having a worse GPU. At 4K resolution for 60 FPS you might need dual SLI GTX 980 but the FX 8350 would still pull it just as well as it needs to do to get you at least your 60 FPS.
Since it's a great deal certainly do it. Also good for future proofing for later 4K upgrade.
but when the gpu is not the bottleneck the cpu is
for most games with a gtx 960+ or r9 380+ at 1080p the fx cpu is the bottleneck
if you lower aa/af or res and the fps does not go up, its the cpu not able to push more info to the gpu
are you kidding me?? now a 8350 bottlenecks a gtx 960... lmao
http://www.techspot.com/review/1128-rise-of-the-tomb-raider-benchmarks/page5.html
I say that ^.
http://www.techspot.com/review/1148-tom-clancys-the-division-benchmarks/page5.html
And that ^ to the bottleneck BS.
On the flip side there are a few and I stress few games that prefer intels higher work per core but for you intel fanboys to incessantly harp on any FX or amd is going to bottleneck any mid range or higher gpu is utter crap.
IIRC, you stated in the past that you had a PII and it bottlenecked a gtx560ti as well if this was you I'd say that is crap to0, if it wasn't you disregard.
Ps, most of us overclock our FX8350s, for $250 the gtx980 would be a damn good move.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gT_dvZfG7hw
At 2:17 8350 vs 4460 GTX980.