安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgKptbCj_jc
Some love it, others not so much. The best ideal for applications side-by-side working. Some games scale nicely, others do not (so you get black edges).
Not sure how anything has convinced you that it is the "future". It's been here for a bit and still games keep coming out that don't support it.
Most of the time you end up having black bars or stretching a 16:9 image... Gross.
21:9 is great for productivity, but not-so-great for gaming. IMO, multi 16:9 monitors would be better than a single 21:9 monitor for productivity... Though multiple 21:9 monitors would be even better.
Azza is spot on with the whole optimal viewing distance. I'd just like to add that higher resolution also results in more detail, since you have more pixels to form the image.
I'm not sure if you thought about curved monitors but.. my experience with curved monitors has been... Not great. While they seem cool at first, playing games that were designed with a flat image seem "odd" on a curved screen.
I find it doubtful. Too many games that just don't support the ratio natively. Stretching looks atrocious.
Even some games that support the ratio natively will end up with a FOV that is blown way out of proportion.