Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
1080p to 2560x1080 = 33% more pixels
1080p to 4k = 300% more pixels
1080p to 3440x1440 = 239% more pixels
More pixels = more GPU load, but higher pixel density means you can turn off AA
1) A 4K monitor,
2) Two GTX 980 Ti in SLI mode (650$ each), or two similar cards from AMD if they have these.
3) A big enough and ventilated enough computer case to hold these two 980 Ti and vent out the heat of 500W (2*250W) from graphics cards and also additional heat from CPU.
4) A powerful PSU.
So if you have only 500$ to spend and dont have a second (of exact same manufacturer and model) 980 Ti already, then 500$ will totally be not enough.
it all boils down to how powerful your PC is, but even a 980 Ti has its limits.
and making sure the games you play support those resolutions would be something to consider beforehand.
I would not go for 4K with your setup. You'd have to sacrifice a lot of settings just to get playable frame rates in many games.
I.e.: http://www.amazon.com/LG-Electronics-34UC87C-34-0-Inch-LED-Lit/dp/B00Y09G6JG
The Asus one you posted is 16:9 1440p, not 21:9.
Ultra-Wide (21:9) is 2560*1080 or 3440*1440
Nothing wrong about curved displays, they're usually still quite pricy though. Up to you if you can / want to pay the extra.
Anyways, what's your PC setup? You need to be able to drive those high res displays as well.