Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
3gb is exceeded in many games. Referring back to GTAV I have a 980 SC and I go over 4gb when turning up the sliders in advanced gfx settings and turning up AA. I can run fxaa or 2xmsaa or 2xmfaa while running with advanced settings turned up a 1/4 way on each. I do run at 60fps though and it will look the world of difference to you playing at 35. Realize other games use little vram and there are others like far cry 4 and the division that use a ton. Also even if you have a 1080p monitor with an nvidia card you can use DSR to render 1440p on your 1080p screen and it looks amazing. the less vram you have the less chance on you being able to do this with a game or pobably any game and keep a decent frame rate
The textures the game is loading are stored in VRAM. The size of the textures, among other things, determines how much VRAM will be needed.
And if you do not have as much as the program is requesting, then it will store the data in slower ways, such as on system RAM. This will cause the game to slow down a lot.
Of course you can, but on some games you can run out of VRAM and your game will chug.
Furthermore, as the quality of textures improves in the future, VRAM requirements are only going to get larger.
However I would not do as someone above said and get the 960 4gb card, it's perhaps the only other gpu nvidia sells that is a worse value then this. Between the 950 at the low end and the 1060 6gb Nvidia at the moment has nothing I'd recommend.
If 200 dollars is all you can manage and nvidia is what you want then get the 3gb card, but configue your game settings to keep your texture quality lowered and don't use MSAA.
the 1060 6g is a completely different gpu
There is only small difference in pricing between the 1060 3GB vs 6GB
6GB can be found for around $249 (the Zotac Mini 1060)
It would be like using a 980 or 980 Ti with only 3GB VRAM, makes no sense for them to have even released it at all.
the 3g is gimped on cores and tmus, about 10% slower than the 6g ver
Well here in UK at least the price difference between 3gb and 6gb version is ~£45. So if the 3gb version is only ~10% slower then it's totally worth it. Specially for budget/low end gaming pc's. But at the moment both 3gb and 6gb versions are not worth buying because of high demand and low stock. When the prices drop it will fully replace gtx750ti/gtx950 which are still the best budget gpus for the price.
In quintessence there is not much difference in most games tested. But I still think it's a waste
of money to buy a new 3GB card seeing games get more hungry for VRAM fast.
If you are in for saving money buy a used 3 GB card.
Max out games with a gtx1060 ? Do you even realise it's meant to be a mid range gpu ? Also even top end gpu's such as gtx1080 can't max out games either...