Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Fx-8350;
Hot -- 50C in bios. :'( of course this is running a stock cooler. Still though 50c in bios?!?
200W at load
Slow to run anything that isnt specifically designed for multicore
Pros; cheap.
Any Intel newer than what you can find in an old Macintosh - its a joke chill;
Isn't nearly as hot as the fx-xxxx
Uses 100-150W less than fx-xxxx
Runs everything light years faster.
Cons; not as cheap
Honestly I have an amd build. I know the torment. I'm forced to use 200W over what normal people use. I have a 700W psu for a system worse than people with a 500W. Its stupid. I say "Oh I have a 700W psu" and people say "OMG SLI CROSSFIRE BURRR" and it's not. I have an fx-8350 actually. That's exactly how that goes.
That said, to mention a couple things:
200w sounds a bit excessive for just the CPU alone, even for an FX 8350. Are you sure thats not for the whole system?
50c sounds about right to be honest, with a stock cooler. I get 55c idle with an i7 930, also on stock cooler. Stock coolers are just loud, worthless crap in general, be it AMD or Intel ones.
700w again sounds a bit excessive. A good quality 500-550w unit can handle an FX system just fine. Same for Intel, around 500-550w. Higher if you want crossfire or SLI.
But an FX 4xxx/6xxx just totally sucks.
The FX6300 can't keep up anymore. I could upgrade to something like a FX8370E on the current socket and see some modest gains for around £150, the other (and preferrable option) would be to switch to intel, but that is basically a rebuild and will cost something like 2.5x the price once a decent new mobo has been factored in.
AMD won't be releasing any new CPU's on the current AM3+ socket, so what's on the market now is all there ever will be - That leaves very little headroom for future upgrades if you go with the AMD option and even if you do, the FX series CPU's are not as fast or efficient as their intel counterparts (albeit quite a lot cheaper).
This guy is spot on. Yes - The FX8350 is rated at 125w, the FX6300 at 90w.
As for temps, my FX6300+ is currently overclocked to 4.2ghz on stock cooler idleing at 37c.
700w psu is way over - the GPU will be the major factor in PSU requirements not CPU. A decent 550w PSU would be more than adequate.
1. make sure the mobo has a 970-990 chipset
2. make sure the mobo has a vrm config capable of overclocking (4+1 with heatsinsk or better)
http://www.overclock.net/t/946407/amd-motherboards-vrm-info-database