Battlefield 1 can my graphics card handle it?

[cal cable guy]

not sure on the system requirements but maybe someone already knows

I have a Radeon R9 380 2gb vram

maybe medium settings 30-40 fps?


thx

[˜lokkandload˜™]

they haven't posted min or recommended requirements yet have they?

[fractal]

Frostbite is a extremely polished engine. A 380 should have no issues at all.
Polaris GPU's are just hitting the market but they are pushing the Vega GPU's for the Battlefield 1 Launch.
Polaris = Low power/cost, high efficiency (never meant to compete with enthusiast cards).
Vega = Enthusiast level.
Was having a chat to an AMD rep a few months ago and he said no way for 2016 and Vega... Guess Nvidia put enough ants in their pants.

[Qwerty]

Messaggio originale di Bad-Motha:

2GB VRAM is not going to cut it for BF1; or pretty much any newer games.

Now a GTX 960 4GB or 380/380X 4GB; that would be fine.

That is completely incorrect, 2GB VRAM is up to par with running just about any recent title that have been released.

[upcoast]

Messaggio originale di Bad-Motha:

GTX 1060 is only around GTX 970 performance area, so I wouldn't even look at that.

RX 480 is expected to be around GTX 980 performance
GTX 1070 is around 2-3X GTX 970 performance

The only thing for sure is where the gtx1070 sits all else is speculation, will there be a gtx1060ti it's anyone's guess just as much a guess as how well the Rx480 and 1060 will perform or not perform.

You seem confident about your information but I'd rather actually see some concrete numbers.

Much like Steam shoves a lot of win 10 ?s into a dump thread there should be a speculation/rumor/guesstamation dump thread as well.

[banzaigtv]

BF1 will likely run on a modified Frostbite 3 graphics engine being used in Star Wars Battlefront, so your best bet is to get at least a GTX 980. Get 16 GB RAM as well. CPU-wise, upgrade to an i7. Use the Star Wars Battlefront requirements as a reference.

[Sensei P]

I have a gtx 745 4GB vRAM could I run it, I have an I3-4150 3.5 GHz CPU and 8 GB of RAM

[CursedPanther]

Messaggio originale di High tech G-Fuel:

I have a gtx 745 4GB vRAM could I run it, I have an I3-4150 3.5 GHz CPU and 8 GB of RAM

If this is you asking whether you'll run BF1 or not, I'd suggest you at least upgrade that GPU.

[Sensei P]

Messaggio originale di CursedPanther:

Messaggio originale di High tech G-Fuel:

I have a gtx 745 4GB vRAM could I run it, I have an I3-4150 3.5 GHz CPU and 8 GB of RAM

If this is you asking whether you'll run BF1 or not, I'd suggest you at least upgrade that GPU.

Premade, could I at least run it with low or medium??

[CursedPanther]

Messaggio originale di High tech G-Fuel:

Messaggio originale di CursedPanther:

If this is you asking whether you'll run BF1 or not, I'd suggest you at least upgrade that GPU.

Premade, could I at least run it with low or medium??

It's all speculation at this point. Wait for official requirement announcement for assurance.

[cal cable guy]

Messaggio originale di CursedPanther:

Think BF4 Ultra is a good reference point for BF1. If you can run the former with an acceptable FPS then you should have no problem.

I downloaded Star Wars Battlefront free trial

it looks like i can run all medium settings 70-90 fps .

my graphics isnt even overclocked

[The Real Slim Shaney]

Messaggio originale di cal cable guy:

Messaggio originale di CursedPanther:

Think BF4 Ultra is a good reference point for BF1. If you can run the former with an acceptable FPS then you should have no problem.

I downloaded Star Wars Battlefront free trial

it looks like i can run all medium settings 70-90 fps .

my graphics isnt even overclocked

I feel like the 380 should be getting better performance in Battlefront than that. I thought the 2GB VRAM might be holding you back, but a quick internet search reveals that most people can max that game with average 60 fps, even with 2GB VRAM. Something's weird.

[CursedPanther]

Messaggio originale di Shaneisthepain:

Messaggio originale di cal cable guy:

I downloaded Star Wars Battlefront free trial

it looks like i can run all medium settings 70-90 fps .

my graphics isnt even overclocked

I feel like the 380 should be getting better performance in Battlefront than that. The 2GB VRAM might be holding you back, but a quick internet search reveals that most people can max that game with average 60 fps, even with 2GB VRAM. Something's weird.

SW Battlefiront is less demanding than BF4 in general as it doesn't have 64-player mode, or destructible environment for that matter in order to accommodate the average audiences with average PCs. DICE has done something clever in order to present a beautiful in-game environment to the public but at the same time doesn't take an overpowered PC to run.

[The Real Slim Shaney]

Anyway, it can't be known until the minimum requirements are released. I would think a 4GB 380/380X or GTX 960 should be high-ultra 60 fps. I am a little worried for 2GB cards, but I don't know.

[NookieCrusher]

Messaggio originale di CursedPanther:

Think BF4 Ultra is a good reference point for BF1. If you can run the former with an acceptable FPS then you should have no problem.

Agreed, even though games are looking better and better they are also getting optimized much more efficiently to run on average systems too at decent visual fidelity :) The ultra high end settings are usually not that noticeable from high/ultra and more for the enthusiasts and graphic sponges with 50/50 vision