R7 360 vs GTX 750TI

[󠀡󠀡]

I got the R7 360, it seems to perform a bit worse than 750TI on most games. However, looking at these benchmarks... http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-AMD-R7-360/2187vs3572
The R7 360 seems to have much better texture detail, Much better reflection handling, and HUGELY faster complex splatting.

Does this mean that if i enable for example, HDR and POM in Minecraft with shaders, i get better performance than i would get with 750TI?

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html

R7 360 is two tiers below GTX 750 Ti.

Both of those cards are not even entry level for gaming anymore, minimum I would currently use would be GTX 950, RX 460, R7 370.

[󠀡󠀡]

Messaggio originale di Rumpelcrutchskin:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html

R7 360 is two tiers below GTX 750 Ti.

Both of those cards are not even entry level for gaming anymore, minimum I would currently use would be GTX 950, RX 460, R7 370.

Not even entry level? While getting 150fps max setting 1080p on cs go?

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

Messaggio originale di ß-мλл:

Not even entry level? While getting 150fps max setting 1080p on cs go?

CS GO is not exactly example of modern demanding game, even potato can run this. Try running Witcher 3 and you will see the difference.

[󠀡󠀡]

Messaggio originale di Rumpelcrutchskin:

Messaggio originale di ß-мλл:

Not even entry level? While getting 150fps max setting 1080p on cs go?

CS GO is not exactly example of modern demanding game, even potato can run this. Try running Witcher 3 and you will see the difference.

I dont have the game.

[SundownKid]

No, they aren't entry level. CSGO is an old game, so that's no indication of what a modern entry level card is like. Entry level implies they will play the most modern games at decent settings.

[[☥] - CJ -]

750 Ti IS considered Entry.
It has similar performance to that of a GTX 950 while being similar in price.

[Cathulhu]

Similar? The 950 is about 50% faster!
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-950-vs-Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti/3510vs2187

[[☥] - CJ -]

Messaggio originale di Cathulhu:

Similar? The 950 is about 50% faster!
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-950-vs-Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti/3510vs2187

See thats the thing
You use a user based site that has MANY different PC configurations rather than a STATIC Configuration.

I go by this http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1670?vs=1662

Yes the GTX 950 is newer, yes it has advantages over the 750 Ti but as one can plainly see it isnt a HUGE improvement. The 750 Ti still handles itself pretty well.

The MAIN difference between the 2 are Non Reference models of the GTX 950, ASUS STRIX and so forth which have even more of an advantage, but with that comes a higher price. But Non Reference 750 Ti's do pretty well themselves also.

It all comes down to price.
And the 750 Ti handles itself pretty well.

[Cathulhu]

Messaggio originale di ☥ - CJ -:

Messaggio originale di Cathulhu:

Similar? The 950 is about 50% faster!
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-950-vs-Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti/3510vs2187

See thats the thing
You use a user based site that has MANY different PC configurations rather than a STATIC Configuration.

Because this way you get more realistic benchmarks. Also, they average out.

Regarding your link, the benchmarks show a clear advantage that confirms the benchmarks in my link.

[calcifer]

GTX 750 Ti is still considered entry-level unless onboard GPUs beat them.

[󠀡󠀡]

I didn't get answer to my question :p

[[☥] - CJ -]

honestly, "BENCHMARKS" like those dont really say a damn thing about GAMING performance. Going by the performance of an R7 370(Cant find the 360 so using the 370) and a GTX 750 Ti, i would say the 750 Ti is better than the R7 360.

As for your question, i cant really say, its been a while since ive messed with Minecraft.