Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
That means for AMD, your option would be about the 5600X or even 5700X (slightly above budget). the 5600 (non-X) might even be a better deal if it can be found cheaper than the 5600X, as it's not much slower.
For Intel, you'd be looking at a Core i5 12400 (or 12400F) or similar, and using DDR4 instead of DDR5 (this can hurt the platform performance some so keep in mind to note what RAM its using if you consult benchmarks/reviews).
So I'd try and do research around those models and see which is better. I know that normally the 12th generation is typically a bit faster than Ryzen 5000 series, but I'm not sure if that applies to the 12400 (I say that because the same thing was true of the 10th generation being a bit faster than the Ryzen 3000 series, but the 3600X was typically a bit faster, or at least not slower, than the 10400F due to the latter having some limits).
Both the 5600, 5600X, and 12400 are hex cores (6 cores) with Hyper-threading/SMT (so 12 threads total). The 12400 doesn't have any additional "e-cores". It's just a strict hex core with only performance cores.
The 5700X might be a "dark horse" consideration in that it allows you to step up to an octo core by barely breaking the budget. It's an excellent value for an octo core and is what the 3700X was in 2020. If any of your software scales well with additional cores/threads, I'd probably recommend considering this.
Lastly, any of these CPUs would pair well with an RTX 3060.
Edit: Oh, I should mention, but the 12400 and Ryzen 5 5600/X seems to include a heatsink/fan cooler. The 5700X would not, so this would raise the total price of going with it unfortunately.
Yep, from what I could tell the 5600x was only $10 more than the standard 5600.
It's GPU bottleneck. 95% CPU utilization and 100% GPU utilization at 1440p.
Could you please explain your rationale behind giving that (I assume) example? What makes you think that there would be 100% CPU Usage and 100% GPU usage at 1080p? Do you have any sources or references?
Generally speaking under theoretical ideal conditions. This is as calculated by one of those bottleneck calculator sites. I understand that under real-world conditions the usage would be very different, and it largely depends on the game.
Don't focus too hard on the hasty, unconfirmed, and non-scientific numbers I posted. Doesn't change the fact that the Ryzen 5 5600 is a very good match for the 3060 and at about $135, it's within OP's budget.
https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapcsales/?f=flair_name%3A%22CPU%22
To see some CPU sales. If you live near a Microcenter, you can get the 5600 for around 100 USD with the cooler following the advice here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapcsales/comments/yijpck/cpu_amd_ryzen_5_5600_vermeer_35ghz_6core_am4/
Otherwise it is 129 ... If you can get it at near 100, don't think anything can beat the value.
For RTX 3060, you won't get any noticeable gain by buying more expensive CPUs.
I just think what you said regarding bottlenecks is misinformation and citing a "bottleneck calculator site" as a source of valid information or correct information is pretty...well for lack of better words, ignorant and naive.
The real world of software is simply way too variable for something like that to apply. Averaging it also doesn't work well when even the same program won't be static in its balance from moment to moment. Now take that and add that many games are VASTLY (I can't overstate that enough) different from the next, and then who knows how the things you may be interested in compare to the collection of software they use to "average" the calculation out. Certain things, and "bottleneck calculators" are among them, are honestly things I despise and wish didn't exist, because they just give users wrong ideas about how tech works.
For one as a fall-back and then for better efficiency and keeping the dGPU clear for heavy lifting.
More importantly, I wouldn't cheap-out on the mainboard and get one with GPU passthrough, to give you more versatility using a VM - especially should you be into games from the 2000s and early 2010s (due to DRM incompatibility) or considering switching to Linux.
That's an urban myth.