Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/amd-zen-cpu-ashes-of-the-singularity-benchmark-leaked.454822892/
http://wccftech.com/amd-zen-naples-soc-benchmarks/
Are the three benchmarks I've seen. The first one is the one AMD decided to show.
The later two aren't all that interesting or impressive as is and is still in line with the 40% increased IPC at-least for the middle one but we'll see what it actually become eventually.
http://seekingalpha.com/news/3214051-amd-collaborates-alibaba-cloud-shares-plus-4_5-percent
http://wccftech.com/amd-polaris-revisions-performance-per-watt/
http://wccftech.com/amd-vega-10-vega-11-magnum/
Pretty sure not "everyone" have seen the content on them.
40% IPC over FX-8350 could be seen as catching up with i7 2600K and 2700K, possibly.
And the Ashes of singularity and GeekBench benchmarks suggest poor performance / core.
On the other hand there's the CineBench one and the catching up in number of ALUs and FMAC / core to Intel. Someone at some time mentioned better than Broadwell but worse than Skylake too and if that would be / core then it would be just fine (on the other hand only interesting if it actually cost quite a bit less than the i7 6800K (rather really the 6900K) and X99 otherwise so what?)
If it just end up competing vs the i7 6700K then "eh", if it does give that performance for the price of an FX-8350 (assuming i7 7700K isn't much faster) then sure it's a great value alternative and a good buy but it's not really something worth waiting for all that much since the alternatives already exist. It's a pain for me since if I wait for it and it doesn't beat Intel in price / performance or performance then what did I wait for? On the other hand if I don't wait and it does beat Intel ...
Why I didnt bother to read your wot, what makes you think I was talking to specifically you.
But thats ok,