Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Fortunetly I don't have much problem with low graphic options.
You really want to stick to old games. like Hardware Hero has suggested, You might want to stick to DirectX9 class games, so basically stuff from the mid 2000s. DirectX11 class games from the last decade might run but at really bad framerates. You can pull off some miracles with these cards but don´t expect much, both my old GT 440 and your GT 710 have anywhere from 50% less horsepower to half and even quarter of performance compared to modern integrated graphics.
I think the regulars come free with the remastered versions? I would look into it if you want to play those. And it's on discount right now. But those two are notorious for crashing on all sorts of hardware so if you get it test it out and if it doesn't work right get the refund I guess. If it does work, it's a real good game.
I'd say stuff from the DirectX 9 era would all be fine. Video cards had VRAM measured in MB, not yet GB, and most GPUs themselves were probably below the performance level of a GT 710 itself. It was probably around the early DirectX 10 era with the GeForce 8 release that things started moving more above it, so the DirectX 10/11 era games, or the very late 2000s and early 2010s, might be okay too. Stuff within the last dozen years to a decade are where it starts getting worse. But this is all generalizing and isn't going to be game to game accurate.
GPUs don't care about age (driver compatibility might become a concern but that's another matter). They just care about the demand. There's stuff from 2012 that might struggle a bit, and stuff from 2022 that might run well. So it's very much game dependent.
I don't think Doom Eternal will run well. That's why I said even with turned down settings, I think it's pushing it too hard.
It will be a mighty struggle, that's for sure. Probably not worth it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lLM6CJTJ70
A good way to check quickly would be here:
https://www.game-debate.com/hardware/index.php?gid=1556&graphics=GeForce%20GT%20710
just enter your CPU and the game you want to play.
I myself am currently playing on a Intel x5-z8350 Atom SoC (Cherry Trail iGPU) which is like 5% as 'fast' as your GT 710.
I can play every single PC game up to circa 2014/5 on this 5 Watt(!!!) PC ... with settings lowered.
The restrictions with a GT 710 and or equal 'no-gaming', gaming GPUs is mostly based on
- DirectX level (won't run DX12 API natively)
- Shader Model level
- VRAM requirement (most games WILL run with less-than-required VRAM, but not all)
- Resolution (with a 710, the lower the game-resolution, the higher the FPS)
- Level of graphic options (again - the lower the settings, the higher the FPS)
I can run 2022 Unity engine games with my 5 Watt Cherry Trail. I cannot run DX12-only games.
Equally, you yourself have to ignore the 'minimum requirement' specs (they are just there for marketing/legal purposes - not reflecting the 'real' minimum) and experiment for yourself.
I don't trust entirely in this kind of pages, but thanks anyway.
About the rest, I already know that and it doesn't bother me at all, I'm just asking to try to extend the life time of my GPU, because i'm planning on change it but I don't know when I will do it because of the hard situation, and it's kind of difficult to know what games I can play.
my2ct
bye