安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
can you send me a screenshot of what I need to edit? Ill show what mine are
https://imgur.com/a/YCvOPAu Should I be looking for something else? Also thank you a ton for your help!
As far as other adjustments, look to your Monitors on screen menu settings, profiles, etc.
https://imgur.com/a/1r1SIYk Its there. I guess all those displays in stores are what not are cherry picked to sucker you in and go ooh aaah, but thats not how they look when you get home :/ damn false advertising lol
Very simple
I've had it for almost a year, I have fiddled with it in every way possible, short of going out and buying a calibrator to use one time.
If you mean older as in Coffee Lake (8th), then yeah, because the 3600 beats the 7700K half of the time in gaming, and more powerful Zen2 chips do so as well, but more often than not. Quad-core SKUs are doomed, because games are gradually shifting to utilise 6+ cores, so it's only a matter of time before older chips like the 7700K are rendered crap. Technically, it already is when you see that a 200$ CPU smacks it around in quite a few titles.
This is getting annoying; you constantly bash Ryzen with ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like Zen being equal to Sandy Bridge and Zen+ being equal to Devil's Canyon, but you've never even used a Ryzen CPU. You can't really bash something to such a degree if you haven't even used the product yourself, but you do so with skewed or outdated information. I know Intel is better to a half-decent degree, because I use both AMD and Intel chips, and I know for a fact that the claims you make about Ryzen are utter bull.
The gap between AMD and Intel is an ever shrinking number, to the point where it's starting to become a matter of if you want to pay more to overclock just for a very minor increase to FPS that you don't even need. Intel is more about ego than anything now.
I have no experience in Overclocking, anytime I try to OC my I7 6700K I get BSOD when I run Prime, so I dont bother with trying.
Only reason I was thinking of a new cpu is I can buy a I7 9700K, mobo and 16gb ram @ 3200mhz for about $550
For me Intel is the choice to go. My pc has 2 purposes.
80% video games. 20% movies/youtube . I dont stream anymore and I dont edit videos. And if I did, I can use my old FX 8350 for that.
AMD is champ at multitasking and multi purpose pc. Intel is champ at dedicated gaming.
As a perfect example. My FX 8350 can render videos about 25% faster than my I 7 6700K
Both AMD FX 8350 and I7 6700K get similar fps fallout 4, Skyrim and a lot of single player games.
Intel shines in many multiplayer games, from 7 days to die, to arma 3, to dayz to Ark.
Doesnt mean AMD is bad. I have had more AMD than I have had Intel. And that was because AMD was usually more wallet friendly. That 3600 may be a better cpu at multi tasking, but I am not willing to replace my cpu and mobo to see it stall out at 22 to 30 fps in Arma 3, Dayz or lower fps in any number of mp games.
AMD is catching up and may pass Intel. I am not a fanboy of either. I like what fits my budget for performance, and that I7 9700K looks like a perfect fit.
My mobo can fit an I7 7700K, but that isnt a really big upgrade and for like $50 more I can buy the I7 9700K
?? I have a 250GB SSD Boot Drive and a 2TB SSHD Storage and a 1TB Storage. I dont see how my hard drive space is going to enhance my performance in any way at all.
Also the ram wont do any noticeable improvement for gaming. Im not editing, no streaming, Ill spend $200 for what? 2 fps? I asked about the cpu, or a new monitor. The rest of my rig is fine.
Also isnt hdd a ide connected hard drive? Sorry dude, I havent had one of those since like 2008
They may be the best for getting the most FPS, but that metric is rapidly shrinking. The 200$ Ryzen 5 3600 is within 15 FPS of the 350$ 9700K's results in the majority of newer titles and pretty much every newly released title, with both easily capable of 144 FPS. It's not a matter of who is better at gaming anymore, it's a matter of choosing between spending a little bit more on the absolute top quality components, or buying intelligently and going with only what you actually need and what's still capable of giving splendid results.
The age of Intel reigning supreme in gaming is long since dead. This is the age of being free to choose and not having to pay more to get the performance you actually want, though most gamers have no idea that there's no reason to go above what your monitor's refresh rate supports, as you'll often have to limit FPS to stop screen tearing anyway if you don't buy a G-Sync/FreeSync display.
https://pcpartpicker.com/user/hawkshawz/saved/4FHjpg
V.S.
https://pcpartpicker.com/user/hawkshawz/saved/P27tpg
People especially like to pin the 3600 against the 9600KF because of its price being cheaper than the 3600 and its overclockability, but the problem is that you still end up making at least 100$ more because you need a good cooler and a Z390 motherboard, which the A-PRO is among the cheapest already, if not the cheapest, and you're not really going to get big enough gains to justify the price without a beefy air cooler.
You could drop the price by compromising other things, but then you end up not getting as much of a price/performance valued system as the 1000$ AMD build.
Again, the cost of that amd, vs the cost of an I7 9700K would be less than $100 difference. The i7 7700K does as much as 20% more in gaming. And you need to consider I play at ultra wide settings. My resolution is 3440x1440. Maybe if I was at 1080P, that Ryzen would have a stronger appeal, the benchmarks at 1080p looks hands down great.
Also if I was doing other stuff, it would be a sure buy, But all I do is game and watch movies on this pc. I need dedicated gaming power, and price per performance, the I7 9700K seems to have the best pound for pound power per dollar. AMD used to be wallet friendly, but they have gotten up in price, and their mobos are expensive as heck too, so what you save on amd, goes into their mobo
Please learn to read the question before offering suggestions I never asked for. HDD could refer to old ide, since you indicated it as such. They are not that old and they work fine. No need to buy an m2 drive until I build a new rig.
Just in case you are having issues with reading
Need Suggestions. Upgrade CPU or Buy a New Gaming Monitor? That was the topic, Suggestions regarding CPU or Monitors. Not asking not looking at anything else.
You can use B450 with Zen2. Gigabyte has Q-Flash, so you can get a cheaper B450 board and it'll run a 3600 just fine because it's a decently low watt chip that can't really overclock without a custom loop, as with all Zen chips. The fact that you don't need to replace the stock cooler and you can use a cheaper motherboard without any real issues as long as the BIOS is up to date for the latest AGESA versions, it becomes way more than just 100$. You absolutely need a good motherboard and cooler for a 9700K.
CPU also matters less the higher your resolution is, it becomes a lower CPU load as the GPU has to work harder at a higher resolution, resulting in lower frames for the CPU to prepare, and that 20 FPS difference is basically zilch in games that greatly benefit from all 6 cores.
He's a troll, just report him, he does this on every thread