安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Unless you have a pressing need and need it now, that is.
You are paying for the extra Vram which is very beneficial.
Like I said somewhere in this thread, Quadros are horrible for gaming. The 3090 Ti is basically a borderline Quadro but can actually play video games.
Ex) Quadro A6000 is more beefier then the 3090 Ti, but is horrible in gaming.
The 3090 Ti is mostly marketed towards Engineers, Architects, Data Science, Film & Animation, etc. These professions can pay $100k+/yr anyways. The 3090 Ti gets work done for them faster and they can use their computer for video games after work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2I69uK9WVU
Hmm, just like my car, smartphone, everything I ever own will outdated and replaced by something better. My career will one day be replaced by a AI robot someday too.
Just get what you can afford, and enjoy life for what it is.
Die shrinking was supposed to reduce power consumption. Apparently that isn't the case anymore.
I still think there is still value in the 3090 TI, it is basically a Quadro that can play video games.
the point is that there are people that have a usecase for this card ! and that for whom it is
No one normal would go for it just for a few FPS and pay double of a 3080Ti ...
but for some there is a usecase especially becuse of the VRam :)
There's nothing particularly weird about retooling some of the highest binned chips in to a consumer card that can push the largest performance metrics on the market, even if it comes at an exorbitant price. There has always and will always be an absolute highest end for consumers that mostly exists because there is a demographic where money is no obstacle. If somebody will buy it, why not sell it?
The 3090ti is not really marketed towards the professional sector, but it is a viable option where CUDA/RT and raw compute is more valuable than bandwidth, scalability and tensor. For pro-sumer use, the entire RTX skew from the 2060 all the way through to the 3090ti is usually viable with OptiX/RT/Tensor support to greatly accelerate most types of workload expected from an individual, but gaming grade GPUs definitely don't come without drawbacks once we enter the professional/enterprise sector where scalability, bandwidth, memory capacity and especially error correction become very valuable metrics.
I ask you to hunt a fly and give you an Elephant gun. Sounds like overkill. Will kill the fly... But why? To look cool?
An elephant gun is a big game gun for use on big game animals.
________
I give you a 3060 with a 1080p/60 screen to game. Sounds good.
I give you a 3090ti with a 1080p/60 screen to game. Sounds like overkill. Will play the games fine... But why? To look cool?
A 3090ti is for 4k, 1440/120+ or 1080/240+.
Make sense?
Well, a Koenigsegg would also be overkill for just about anyone, so...
Not that it's not nice, it's just more than anybody really needs.
My point is that the more I pay, I better expect that product to be overkill, then underkill. Regardless of whether its more then necessary.
You know I forgot to mention that some games can eat a crap load of Vram. I know Halo Infinite can easily eat 10GB and thats not even 4k.
Now that UE5 has released, we can expect atleast 6-10GB average to get those photo-realistic textures, lighting, etc.