Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
Both of these cards are Radeon RX580s. They have the same basic mechanicals, but the Armour and Gaming X models have different cooling systems and that makes the Gaming X slightly quieter, slightly colder, and slightly more expensive.
For my two cents cents, you're better off with an Nvidia card. Preferably one made by EVGA or Asus.
I strongly disagree. Perhaps it's different with AMD GPUs, but overclocking an Nvidia card can make a dramatic difference to framerates and gameplay. When I was struggling to run the Arkham series on my GTX970, overclocking meant the difference between playing on High and playing on Ultra with 60 FPS.
Only buy armour if you plan to remove the cooler.
On the nvidia side it's practically the same cooler on the 1060 armour as on the 1080ti armour lol
Overclocking whatever will give you better performance, let it be an AMD, Nvidia or an Adreno phone GPU...
and this "buy Nvidia, avoid AMD" nonsense needs to stop on this forum.
At the moment, when it comes to GPU's, it's hard to suggest AMD with their mark up being worse than nvidia, you loose out on gameworks, but, you get access to freesync which is cheaper than gsync, really it comes down to whats needed and budget.
Right now, nvidia is on top, ryzen has some solid arguments for it, especially now ryzens update seems to reliably clock to 4.1GHz, and xfr2 seems to be doing the same thing as MCE does, which pretty much gives the 2600x the outright win over the 8400 now, however the 2700x Vs 8700k is still very much down to use case as to which wins.
X299 Vs threadripper is another interesting one where both have their pro's and cons.
It would be interesting to see what AMD could actually achieve if they dropped consumer GPU's and focused solely on consoles and CPU's, which is where their strength seems to lie, it's not like nvidia seems to really give a damn about their GPU's these days, as they are an entire generation ahead performance wise pretty much.
Speaking for myself, all AMD has to do is provide a worthwhile competitor. I recommended their GPUs plenty, before you became a regular here.
My other GTX1070 is also an MSI Armor and no complaints with that one either.