安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Look at it.
You asked me a question like this "So was I?" that is not make a sense to me. And you misunderstood on my comment.
What I claimed is true. I still do not recommend to use different brand in between two 2-channel. All 4 modules should be same brand names/model numbers if possible.
you can use double sided and single sided, random brands, random speeds, ect.. together with zero issues.
the only exception is latency, cas latency usually needs to be matched so no issues arise.
That is why it would've been easier if just get same brand names/model numbers. For this, I didn't see any reason to dissolve my claim.
and you likely didnt match the cas latency.... had nothing to do with brand or model number
no it doesnt matter at all to have different brands or "model number"... that has zero to do with the issue you had, facts are facts.
i could easily go buy a different brand ram module than my current ram, match the cas latency and have zero issues.
as for the "model number" thing you keep mentioning.... that is irrelevant as a "model number" has zero to do with ram specs or how they work, nor whether they will work together.
not sure what your "dissolving", but your claim is false.
its a known fact, why would i need to prove anything to a random on steam... or the internet for that matter...
but here, since you cant get over being wrong...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTS0ybQ3lCI
and to add to it, like i mentioned only cas latency is important, tho matching latency is important, you can get away with being close to matched (higher or lower) and it will still work, it just defaults to the lower cas on the lowest module, same goes for speeds (GHZ).
brand has nothing to do with it, nor does a model number... a model number has literaly nothing to do with anything, except being a model number.
watch the video or dont, no skin of my back, your wrong, deal with it.
bye
Okay, but that's a different statement now. I took your statement of...
"There is not many motherboard can take two different two-channel well."
...to mean you thought that four slot motherboards that were dual channel capable (as opposed to quad channel capable) weren't often able to reliably run four modules/two sets of dual channel RAM reliably. That is why I was replying to you to begin with because I've never had it NOT work.
However, even if you meant there's not many that can take mixed RAM, I still want to say that's likely wrong. You're extrapolating your one experience to signify that most others are the same way, and that's not always the case. In reality, RAM is more robust than people think.
You're seemingly basing your claim that very few motherboards will handle this based on your one experience only? Anecdotal evidence of one attempt is hardly a good foundation to presume the majority are the same, and the burden of proof is on you to support your claim that they are, not ask others to prove it isn't true by refuting your lone experience.
it's how it works, if you can't see the video or know what it means hmm..