安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
In Cyberpunk 2077, you can definitely see the difference, and it looks very nice.
The issues are really just that so few games have been released or upgraded to have RT, DLSS, etc. However it is very nice, especially the DLSS.
I don't take the whole "most people can't tell the difference" BS into consideration, cause many people have bad eyes and can't tell the difference between 1080p vs 2160p (4K) as well; that's their problem, not mine.
CP 2077 is one game where it looks very bad without it; making it look like some game from before 2015 or something.
Now many folks have come to me and said things like:
"I don't need RT or DLSS and I don't care about such things, why should I buy any RTX GPU"
Well because the fact remains that even if you do not use such features in your games, you're going to hit a brick wall with the best available GTX GPU. The only way to have more raw gpu performance above the best GTX card, is to step up to a better RTX card. Such as RTX 2080 Super or better. Otherwise a 1080 Ti is just fine.
Current-generation AMD GPUs are pretty good assuming you don't want to use ray tracing or DLSS... lol.
Funny that you act like the alternative to an NVIDIA RTX card is some several year old GTX card...
They have crappy cooling, design and drivers. No thanks.
AMD hasn't had a good GPU since ATI used to make them.
The alternative is a GTX card, such as 1080 Ti, which still to this day pretty much mops the floor with even most currently available AMD GPUs.
The rtx didn't look good inside my pc either, didn't match like the gtx. I'll probably give the rtx3060 to my daughter or something. I'm going to rock my gtx founders edition. It works better than I remember, especially in cyber punk. Plays flawlessly on medium unlike last year.
Maybe you simply don't like the look of the RTX 3060 you have. That is not the only design out there. Plenty of other brands with different designs. Overall the 3060 mops the floor against your old GPU. Obviously you don't play anything demanding if you went back to the 1070 and are happy with that performance. 1070 performance became not enough years ago.
Lol the AMD GPUs perform better in benchmarks than the NVIDIA cards on modern games (assuming ray tracing and DLSS are not being used)... and with regard to DLSS... super resolution techniques like DLSS do not produce the same visual quality as native rendering, especially with motion.
So if all you want to do is play video games and you don't want the reduced visual quality of DLSS and you don't care about ray tracing (which is rational since most people can't even see the difference with ray tracing anyway); AMD is clearly better.
https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/1484451761861358796/5799AE80F1E6059FC23FB3F77AAD3E85C0948BF7/?imw=5000&imh=5000&ima=fit&impolicy=Letterbox&imcolor=%23000000&letterbox=false
It also runs better than I remember too, so it matured.
Do you play below 4K by any chance?
*Looks up sadly at beautiful Sapphire RX 5700 XT Nitro+, which has been rock solid, quiet as a whisper, and cool as a cucumber for as long as I've had it.*
"Shh, it's okay. He didn't mean it."
So is every feature in its early days. AA was hype. T&L was hype. And then eventually it becomes so widely implemented and used, that we can't live without it.
So sure if a game does traditional lighting really well it might be hard to tell without seeing it side by side. Or if the ray tracing used is subtle that could be tough to spot too. But it's hard to deny the stark differences ray tracing makes to something like Quake 2 or Minecraft.
At the end of the day it's one more tool that will help games look pretty nice. Hardware will get better, and so will techniques and examples of implementation. Give it another five years and it'll be everywhere and games without ray tracing will look dated in comparison.
I have to agree, in my personal experience I've been just fine with AMD cards. And I've alternated between buying NVIDIA and AMD cards on my last 3 PC builds... haven't noticed a difference... aside from the performance improvement with each upgrade. But granted, none of my AMD cards were from the more controversial RX 5000 series.
I am not too fussed out it yet.
When the RTX cards came out, nvidia claimed ray tracing was the future.
Long term, gaming will be tray tracing the whole scene with some very very good AI based upscaling. It would make game development much easier, and hopefully out of the hands of companies like electonic arts.
It is improving. I very much hope it is NOT eventually controlled by Nvidia.
We will see.