Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
A - slower performance than the application you want to be fast
B - just as fast performance than the application you want to run
If you pick A, then the running OS is only as fast as your HDD, and prone to some I/O bandwidth restrictions when your application is running - should any background tasks need to be run when your application is running.
If you pick B, then the running OS will be just as fast as the application you are running, including any background tasks that need to be run.
Hopefully you can pick the best answer based on above...
Will it increase gaming performance at all?
kk alrighty
thank you
Depending on how critical disk access is to the game's performance, is how I might word that.
which may decrease fps (when lower res textures/models are less work for the gpu to render)
Yes, for a game like DCS an SSD is a must to prevent stuttering. Doesn't make a difference to most games though other than load times. An SSD as your system drive however is almost a no-brainer though really. What I did was get a 500GB M2 drive as my system drive and I just put a few games on there (like DCS) that really benefit from it. I also have a few smaller SATA SSD drives (128 and 250GB) that I just put long-loading games on (Combat Mission, Squad, ARMA, etc).
I upgraded RAM to 16GB at roughly the same time (also a must in DCS) so maybe it was the RAM. Maybe it's 'get an SSD if you don't have enough RAM'...
What also helps most if you can't afford multiple ssds is installing os and apps to the ssd, install games to the hdd. If the game benefits from ssd, as some do, it's best to install just those to your ssd if you can, such as gtav, ark and large open world games. With all the major game clients they allow you to dictate where games install and you can have games from a single client, like steam, have options to install on whichever drive you wish. I just would not install games to an external drive or flash drive.
Every PC today should have the OS and main apps installed to an ssd, they are no longer super expensive. Nothing but really really old PC should have OS installed to a hdd, as this slows down the entire machine, no questions.
As far as fps, that alone is not the issue,the real issue is many open world games must keep caching data as you move around the world, such as gtav, this is what I mean regarding games that benefit from being installed to ssd.
When the OS is on SSD, there is less chance of any tasks causing any I/O problems and you will attain your max FPS. Not an increase in FPS, just a reduction of any chances that can cause any FPS drops.