Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Or
You've just started monitoring this and are getting all twisted up about unknowns?
And let me ask you this, Is 60-75C within the Ryzen 5 2500U's normal operating temperature range? So is the problem you think these temps are harmful, or you just don't like them even though they're fine?
https://www.amd.com/en/products/apu/amd-ryzen-5-2500u because 60-75c seems fine to me and putting your CPU under the right load can cause temps to go up or spike a little even with good cooling, not all workloads generate the same temperatures.
So again, I ask. Do you really have a problem? Or you just want the temps to be different so you're making one up?
Also the thing with made up averages: AVG(1,3,5,7,9) = 5. So yeah, if it's really a cooling problem there's no guarantees you were going to hit average or better, someone has to be below average. Why couldn't that be you? There's a dozen variables that could cause some minor imperfections in your cooling. It's not like it's all uniform.
I'm just worried about the jet engine-like sounds happening for quite a while and my normal range felt more like 50-65 C before stuff started happening. In one game it went from 70 to 85 C in less than 30 min. Basically, the closer it's to 90 C the more worried I am. Fan RPM values also feel... off. Usage being below 25% while gaming and still having such high RPM and temp also feel off.
I'm not saying you don't have any issues or your concerns aren't warranted. But I am saying you wouldn't be the first person to make up a problem because they decided to take a look at that data and don't like it and decide that it was much better in the past. Which it could be, or things are the same and they just didn't notice them before. Humans are fickle that way.
Ultimately if you're not actually having thermal throttling you should be fine. If you are having thermal issues affecting performance you're probably going to need to take the thing apart and reseat the heatsink and do whatever tweaks would satisfy you. Those be your options.
Sometimes things are defective, or imperfect, sometimes things wear out. And sometimes we as users are crazy... it's all manageable though, one way or the other. In my old age I'm a little bit more permissive of things unless there's something actually warranting action (or immediate action).
Your laptop won't melt or explode in the meantime. Too many safety features for that to really happen.
85C to 90C is indeed warm and I'd be looking to cool it better if I saw that on a desktop, and I personally (subjectively) wouldn't like it even on a laptop, but it comes with the territory, and as was said, unless you're seeing throttling, it's fine.
You need to understand that "utilization" as a percent on multi-core CPUs isn't as that one single number seems. On a quad core SMT CPU like yours (4 cores but 8 threads), 25% would basically mean two of the eighd threads are simultaneously loaded and the other six aren't. If a game can mostly only utilize one or two cores/threads, this is STILL "fully loaded" for that part of the CPU. The extra cores just aren't working. The CPU will still warm up though.
It's becoming more and more common for people to see these "low" values on CPU while also seeing below 100% utilization on GPU and go "why isn't my system being utilized in games because neither is a bottleneck".
EDIT. I think I see the problem causing stuff beyond 75 C. The power of a single and a pair of cores of my CPU might be kinda too weak. If games are limited to using only two cores, it could be that they struggle to keep up without their other half.
What GPU do you have?
If all you have is the onboard AMD Vega, that's what will be lacking in games, not your CPU.
I would wipe out drivers using the DDU app, done via Safe Mode. Select each brand of gpu and select "clean but do not restart". Once all are wiped out, tick the box for "disable Windows auto driver installer". Then reboot normally. Then download and insyall the latest official drivers for your Motherboard Chipset and GPU(s) from AMD.COM
Then switch between power profile in Windows as you feel the need. Balanced for general OS use; AMD or High Performance for prior to launching a Game
Well base clockspeed is almost meaningless. I mean unless you're having thermal throttling the CPU will run at the boost speed most of the time under load.
Granted you're running a midrange mobile CPU. There's nothing wrong it. It's just not the fastest or the most powerful per core CPU. And it's not like 3.0ghz means the same thing performance-wise across all CPUs anyway.
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-FX-4300-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2500U/2879vsm378273 For example.
Cinebench > cpu only test is another good way to compare