Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I would personally get the i5 and the spend the extra on the GPU
It's a myth. People usually complain because something else is wrong. Ryzen 1000 series was indeed a clunky launch. It was the last bet for AMD's survival so the flaws had to be forgiven, else there would be no competition. However, it has drastically improved. 3000 series is stable already. Ryzen has been picky with RAM indeed. But who even pairs such CPUs with RAM sticks like ADATA? ADATA isn't reliable as they are known for using recycled faulty leftovers and selling it as new.
I myself had issues with 2700X before, but the problem wasn't CPU, but B350M motherboard which worked fine with 1600. Probably power delivery issue.
AMD is reliable in CPU area.
and gpu lol
Do they own them? XD
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-10700K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-10600K/4070vs4072
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-10700K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-10400/4070vs4073
Userbenchmark isn't really good to compare CPUs.
If you think about it, i7 is in the end more worth. 8 cores against 6. The CPU will serve for much longer. Less worries about things running in background.
The headroom is there and it can come extremely handy.