Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
This would cripple performance and be an awful idea.
With that said, I would still go 32gb ram and no less. Some games may not quite use that much but what about system and games? What about doing something else while your game is in the pause menu and you tab out? You don't want to wait for storage paging to happen or crash from poorly optimized memory management. What if you download a poorly optimized early-access game? Sometimes those have memory leak or poor memory management and want more ram so you don't crash. You still want your pc to be able to handle these things and more ram is the key.
It also strongly depends on the task(s) the user wants to do, how many things they want to have open at any given time together, and how big a game is / how well optimized it is. Don't give intentionally bad information.
Its literally impossible to future proof something. Future proof is a straight up lie and you're giving bad information actually.
Tell me in 30 years how 16gb ram is doing for ya. Back in the 90's it was a big deal when we upgraded from 4mb ram to 8mb.
I'm aware of it. Cripple, however, is too strong a word for the performance drop from dual to single channel RAM.
Going back to the OP - what do you expect from your PC other than playing games?
Why a 2 slot MB? Budget constrictions?
More toward the "future proofing" idea would be to leave yourself an upgrade possibility, get a 4 slot MB and a 2x8GB kit now, keeping the cost lower with no performance hit.
Wanna stick to a 2 slot, you should get 32GB now if you want "future proof" and no upgrade in the future.
Then again, 2 slot + 16GB RAM might be all you ever need.
I have no way of knowing for sure what resources certain games will require 3 years from now or if you decide to use your PC for something that will require more than 16GB.
I had 16 GB in 2011, when 4 GB wasn't seen as too little, and 8 GB was firmly a lot/becoming the sweet spot. For the last couple of years, it's been barely enough (but, that's simply for me).
For gaming/general use, it's mostly fine for most people. But, some particular games, mods, and/or heavy multi-tasking, it might be enough but barely. On the other hand, 8 GB is still enough for some.
If you don't know if you need 32 GB yet, you're most likely fine getting 16 GB right now, but I would NOT recommend pushing yourself into the corner and getting a board with 2 slots. Reason being, if 16 GB ends up being restricting for you, you can simply add another 16 GB (which won't cost too much more versus having just gotten 32 GB to begin with), but if you only have 2 slots, you'll have to replace it entirely, then sell the old stuff to try to recoup just some of the difference.
It varies per user, you have little to no idea and just want to say No with no realistic thought on the highly dependent nature of "it depends on the task the user wants to do" as mentioned by a few competent people.
If the task is above a certain point, 16GB is not future proof, but if the user has tasks that almost always use far less than 16GBs, it''s entirely realistic and future proof.
Seriously, don't just take a swing in the dark without any thought into something with an absurd reply.
Take you own advice for that.
Literally everyone other than yourself apparently, know its impossible to futureproof in tech. Technology moves at much too rapid of a pace.
I'll say it slower so you understand...ready?...You...can't...futureproof...when....building...a....pc....period.
I think you should take that guy's advice.
It's possible to future proof in technology. Whether or not it's feasible depends on your use-scenario. 16GB is "future proof" for someone. But for me it's not even "current proof."
In my opinion specifically doing something just for the sake of "future proofing" is dumb. Now, whether or not you want to, or even can, future proof your PC for your use scenario, of course you can and should do that.
You going around saying "future proofing is impossible" is not evidence for it. it's a claim. That you have failed to support.
Here it is one more time:
You can future proof when building a PC. PROVE me wrong.
"Future-proofing is the process of anticipating the future and developing methods of minimizing the effects of shocks and stresses of future events" according to Wikipedia.
It's an abstract concept, and it's not about whether it works or not. it refers to the action of ATTEMPTING to ANTICIPATE.
Which is not only doable, should be at least considered. In all actions.
Otherwise every event will surprise you.
Now, an example: You buy a laptop expecting it to future-proof your use scenario. Then in a year you realize it's not enough for your use-scenario after all. This will result in you failing to anticipate the future.
Another example: You buy a laptop expecting it to future-proof your use scenario. Then in a year you realize it's not only enough, but enough for many more years for your use-scenario. This will result in you succeeding to anticipate the future.
Simply: People who are happy with their purchase down the line, several years from it, are not only future-proofing themselves, but also succeeding at it. Whereas people who AREN'T happy with their purchases down the line, several years from it, merely attempted it and failed.
It really is this simple. 100% anticipation of the future IS impossible, of course. But you can still perform the action of future-proofing.
Whether it's feasible, dumb, insane, awesome or whatever, depends on many things, mostly the user and their use-scenario. But it's definitely not _impossible_.
Now, i WILL be shocked if you manage to regurgitate an intelligent reply to this.
Sure, you're absolutely wrong. Thats it, congrats on wasting your time spewing out nonsense.
You can't build a PC today, that will be good in 60 years. Impossible.
The end.
Duh.
Thats not future proof. Thats good for the next 5 years.
Future proof. Good for now plus the future, all of it. 10 years, 30 years, 100 years...and thats not possible, so no future proof.
Yes it is.
Again thats impossible.