安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
If Vsync is disabled, Enable it and go from there.
the gpu will go to idle state when done drawing frames if using some form of vsync/gsync/rtss
if the laptop is limiting gpu performance, it will still be 100% of the limited clocks
Download and install latest from amd.com and nvidia.com for...
AMD Ryzen Chipset Driver
NVIDIA RTX 30 series (Notebook/Mobile)
Reboot as needed after each driver install has completed.
No, it really isn't. Shouldn't be able to hit 100% usage even on a 3080 mobile version, when only playing RUST.
That's. Not. How. It. Works.
Every game? So Minecraft should use 100% of a 3080? City of Villains should use 100% of a 3080? Command & Conquer Generals should use 100% of a 3080? That would waste immense amounts of power and contribute literally nothing to those games.
Not everything needs to use 100% of a GPU or CPU, and often that's entirely ok and acceptable. Now, Rendering to a file, you can normally see 100% of a device usage depending on the program.
You three really need to learn how inaccurate those statements are, and why it gives extremely bad information to people which could cause them to make bad choices by your recommendations. Please don't spout random nonsense and hope it sounds legitimate, because it isn't.
Garbage.
Do try those exact games with a 3080 and feel free to realize that they will never hit 100% with those.
Are you trolling or are you actually under the impression that GPUs should always be 100% with all games? If you're serious you have no idea what you're talking about.
Generally in modern games you want your gpu to run at 100% to get all the performance, if it's not then you are using vsync/fps cap which is fine or your cpu holds you back or the game is badly optimized/reaching engine limitation.
And this:
So you at least are capable of understanding a blanket statement like that is blatantly false now. But you don't use such a blanketing statement and then turn around and admit that those things wont use the gpu to its full power. So if those can't use full power of the GPU, obviously that means things shouldn't use the full power unless either capable of doing such as designed by and for the task, or that the GPU can't process the demand more quickly than its specifications which does not improve performance when hitting 100%; you're at capacity.
Still wrong, the GPU doesn't need to hit 100% to get "all the performance". You generally want to avoid 100% in any scenario that doesn't intentionally use/require 100% such as rendering to a file, live manipulating of large 3D objects, or Mining.
Hitting 100% usually means you're not getting as much as you could, ie a hardware limitation, when hitting such often causes slowdowns or negative performance due to hitting a cap especially if you're using a stock unit which will likely have temperature issues for maintaining 100%. Having more overhead for games is better, it means the card is so powerful/efficient, that it will not hit 100% with the demand given to it.
Have you tried using a Mining GPU for primary display?
Have you tried using a Workstation with 100% CPU for any other task you desire while it's at 100%?
Those two show why 100% is not "all the performance". It would be all in the sense of "as much as it can give at this level", but it does not make it better.
This is RUST we're talking about, you only have 131 Hours, do you even know what the performance is generally like for better GPUs?
That's still Incorrect. Keep trying.