安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Bought it, with a basic amazon choice fin cooler for it ,for 5 euro :D
As some models can run way too hot during period of heavy sustained writes.
Yes they run well when warm, but they should not be going above 70*C
They will start running sluggish or just start failing altogether if they hit around 75*C+
They can thermal throttle but its hard for that feature to be effective without any heatsink at all.
I would not suggest Crucial SSDs though.
I'd strongly suggest Sabrent Rocket series.
Crucial SSDs are absolutely fine and are some of the soonest I'd recommend. They've been one of the more solid options since SSDs became a thing. Whether they have the fastest offering or whether it's the best for the price is another matter and depends, as I mentioned above, but as a brand alone they are absolutely one of the more solid ones.
Overall, for an OS or Games drive, you don't need to spend that extra money on super fast NVME drives. It does absolutely nothing to speed up anything with an OS or Games. They are made for heavy work and content creators.
If you are going all out, sure those options are fine, but then so are other brands. There's is nothing about Crucial that makes it worse as a brand (I'd argue the opposite but purely based on my own opinion; that it's been one of the more solid RAM and SSD brands over the years/decades) and there's nothing about Samsung that makes it worlds better either.
A lot of advice on this forum, and this also applies largely to PSUs I've noticed, focuses FAR too much on brand and less on individuals options/models at a certain price point and scenario.
I don't agree. There's some decent midrange NVMe that's pretty close to SATA SSD prices but can be 2-3 times faster. They're not in the same league as the highend Sabrent or Samsung SSD's, but you're not going to be worse off.
Sure you can argue the diminishing returns but I don't think all other things being equal that disqualifies midrange NVMe.
Not to mention NVMe doesn't require cables or cable management which can be a nice bonus.
I will agree most people will be fine with a SATA or NVMe, it's very hard to feel a difference in general purpose use between the two.
the crucial p5 1tb for $92 .. not bad... or sk hynix gold p31 1tb for $108 ...
I'm needing the extra size... , running 500gig now ...