difference between 900p and 1080p performance?

[HardCoreGamer]

I have an i3 9100f, gtx 1650, 8gb ram 2400mhz, and am right now using a 900p monitor and was wondering how much fps loss there would be on games like battlefront 2 and rocket league if I go 1080p

[nullable]

I mean you can always just switch and see if you're happy. But if you need a bit more than that.

1. Set up your FPS counter
   
2. Play a game at 900p, how many FPS do you get?
   
3. Play the same game at 1080p, how many FPS do you get?

That's going to give you the best results for your configuration and specific games you're playing. I don't know that I would trust random users input for a question so specific, you're going to get a lot of approximates. And you might have trouble finding websites or benchmarks that provide the accuracy you might want.

1,440,000 pixels @ 900p

2,073,600 pixels @ 1080p

1080p is like 30% more pixels. Unfortunately performance doesn't scale linearly so it's not going to be a 30% performance difference (except when it is). Performance varies between games, that holds true for resolution switching too.

[HardCoreGamer]

Snakub Plissken a écrit :

I mean you can always just switch and see if you're happy. But if you need a bit more than that.

1. Set up your FPS counter
   
2. Play a game at 900p, how many FPS do you get?
   
3. Play the same game at 1080p, how many FPS do you get?

That's going to give you the best results for your configuration and specific games you're playing. I don't know that I would trust random users input for a question so specific, you're going to get a lot of approximates. And you might have trouble finding websites or benchmarks that provide the accuracy you might want.

1,440,000 pixels @ 900p

2,073,600 pixels @ 1080p

1080p is like 30% more pixels. Unfortunately performance doesn't scale linearly so it's not going to be a 30% performance difference (except when it is). Performance varies between games, that holds true for resolution switching too.

Im planning on going 1080p so that's why I'm asking

[_I_]

1920x1080 = ~2mp
1600x900 = ~1.4mp
about 25% difference

not linear in gpu/cpu load but close enough for a gpu limited estimate

1650 is on the weak side for 1080p gaming
look up videos on how well it does with the games
worst case, lower settings til it plays good enough for you

[Illusion of Progress]

Is this the older 16:10 1440p x 900, or 1600 x 900? Just asking because along with the resolution jump (which won't be linear as some have pointed out), if you're using 16:10 now and move to 16:9, then you'll be drawing about 10% more information to the sides that you're not now, which will also add to increased demand. I presume it's 1600 x 900 but I wanted to mention it in case.

[nullable]

That is a good question. I assumed 16:9 because it's been about about a decade since 16:10 was pretty aggressively phased out (based on my perception of easily buying a 16:10 monitor at Sam's Club circa 2009, and there being practically no 16:10 options a few years later on sites like Newegg.)

[Heaven Fall]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDvix8uVjJs

Watch this

He play on ultra, if you want you can lower the graphic setting

[_I_]

there are still some good 1920x1200 displays (16:10) available new

1440x900 is not really considered 900p tho

https://pcpartpicker.com/products/monitor/#sort=price&a=16010

[Illusion of Progress]

Snakub Plissken a écrit :

That is a good question. I assumed 16:9 because it's been about about a decade since 16:10 was pretty aggressively phased out (based on my perception of easily buying a 16:10 monitor at Sam's Club circa 2009, and there being practically no 16:10 options a few years later on sites like Newegg.)

Yeah, as did I, but like you said about it being impossible to determine difference (it's anything but linear, usually), I just wanted to add that in case it was. A lot of people hold onto monitors for longer.

_I_ a écrit :

there are still some good 1920x1200 displays (16:10) available new

1440x900 is not really considered 900p tho

https://pcpartpicker.com/products/monitor/#sort=price&a=16010

I'm not sure if there is an official designation for 900p, and 1600 x 900 would make a more likely one if so, given it's the same aspect ratio as 720p and 1080p (and often times, so-called 720 HDTVs were really 1280 x 768 or 1366 x 768 or something; My HDTV is strange and I never 100% figured its resolution out but I'm almost positive it's a 1280 x 768 panel in 16:9 format, and if you ask how... non-square pixels). But anyway, it's just an informal usage people use to refer to the vertical pixel count, and since 1440 x 900 was a thing, I figured I'd clarify that it could have an extra impact if so. Like another poster said though, I imagine it's more likely 1600 x 900 anyway.