What's your opinion

[✪XeonHETRO]

LG Ultragear 24600F vs Lenovo G25-10?

Also I've had a long discussion about tn vs IPS panels so please don't suggest me to go with IPS panel.
Thanks alot

[emoticorpse]

I'd choose the Lenovo. I just left huge bezels.

[JohnMars78]

Is it LG Ultragear 24GL600F ?
They're not much different as far as the panel goes.
The LG one has an extra HDMI port that might not be needed, the rest being the same for connectivity.
That Lenovo looks better with that thin bezel and it has a height and tilt adjustable stand.
The LG - thick bezel, almost no stand adjustment possible other than a bit of tilt.

The major difference would be: Lenovo G25-10 is G-Sync capable, LG Ultragear is Free-Sync.

Good review for the LG: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2P0CPKWN6vE
And it looks like it's quite capable of handling adaptive-sync for nVidia cards, too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39qpQc_Xu4Y

[✪XeonHETRO]

JohnMars78 eredeti hozzászólása:

Is it LG Ultragear 24GL600F ?
They're not much different as far as the panel goes.
The LG one has an extra HDMI port that might not be needed, the rest being the same for connectivity.
That Lenovo looks better with that thin bezel and it has a height and tilt adjustable stand.
The LG - thick bezel, almost no stand adjustment possible other than a bit of tilt.

The major difference would be: Lenovo G25-10 is G-Sync capable, LG Ultragear is Free-Sync.

Good review for the LG: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2P0CPKWN6vE
And it looks like it's quite capable of handling adaptive-sync for nVidia cards, too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39qpQc_Xu4Y

Lenovo says that the G25-10 supports G sync but I think in some review I saw that it's fake and it has only the free sync.
I don't know which of the monitor has better colours, as for LG there are lots of positive reviews saying that it has got very vibrant and good colours, but for Lenovo there aren't much reviews. But then on the other hand Lenovo due to thin bezels looks far more good than lg one.

[JohnMars78]

Oh, right, missed that. The Lenovo is G-Sync compatible. So it's a Free-Sync monitor, but it's compatibility with G-Sync is verified by nVidia, listed here: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/products/g-sync-monitors/specs/

The LG is not on that list but, as you can see in that Hardware Unboxed review above, it works anyway.
Found some written reviews for the Lenovo. In terms of image quality those two seem to be very close. Can't say more without actually testing them myself.
I guess it's down to your personal preference and you can't really go wrong with either one, considering the price.

[✪XeonHETRO]

JohnMars78 eredeti hozzászólása:

Oh, right, missed that. The Lenovo is G-Sync compatible. So it's a Free-Sync monitor, but it's compatibility with G-Sync is verified by nVidia, listed here: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/products/g-sync-monitors/specs/

The LG is not on that list but, as you can see in that Hardware Unboxed review above, it works anyway.
Found some written reviews for the Lenovo. In terms of image quality those two seem to be very close. Can't say more without actually testing them myself.
I guess it's down to your personal preference and you can't really go wrong with either one, considering the price.

Can you tell me what's the difference between getting certified from nvidia to be gsync compatible and actually having gsync. I don't get it.
Thanks~

[JohnMars78]

Here's some reading for you:
https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/g-sync-vs-freesync-vs-g-sync-compatible

https://www.displayninja.com/g-sync-compatible-vs-native-g-sync/

It'll explain things better and faster.

[Autumn_]

Real G-sync is done with a module in the display, this method is superior in every way except cost.
G-sync comparable, which is Freesync (VESA Adaptive Sync) is a software solution, slightly worse than G-sync. The compatible ones have been verified to work by Nvidia, meaning they meet their performance standard.

As a whole, you're unlikely to see a difference between them unless you have a super high FPS camera and record the screen, or are playing near the lower frame cap of the displays. Which will be basically unplayable anyway.

So in short, it doesn't matter.

[✪XeonHETRO]

JohnMars78 eredeti hozzászólása:

Here's some reading for you:
https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/g-sync-vs-freesync-vs-g-sync-compatible

https://www.displayninja.com/g-sync-compatible-vs-native-g-sync/

It'll explain things better and faster.

Ty

[✪XeonHETRO]

Autumn_ eredeti hozzászólása:

Real G-sync is done with a module in the display, this method is superior in every way except cost.
G-sync comparable, which is Freesync (VESA Adaptive Sync) is a software solution, slightly worse than G-sync. The compatible ones have been verified to work by Nvidia, meaning they meet their performance standard.

As a whole, you're unlikely to see a difference between them unless you have a super high FPS camera and record the screen, or are playing near the lower frame cap of the displays. Which will be basically unplayable anyway.

So in short, it doesn't matter.

Ok might go lenovo then