Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Please note that I had also overclocked my 2500k@4.5GHz, so it's way faster than stock speed 2500.
You can usually see bottleneck when your GPU is at 99/100% and CPU is way lower.
Anecdotes are fun.
Well I was running GTA V on an i5 3570k that I never bothered to overclock, and it's not much better than a 2500k. I was running a GeForce 970 and was able to get 60FPS @ 1080p on fairly high settings without too much trouble.
Also the wife was running a i5 2500k at stock and a GeForce 1070 and she got similar if not better performance depending.
And a 2500 vs 2500k (at stock) aren't exactly apples and oranges different.
Performance was fine, so what's the problem? You don't like the circumstances the performance is achieved?
Does that matter if you're meeting your performance goals?
There's plenty of games the 2500 can run great, not everything was released in 2019, and a RX 570 will work great on a lot of those games. The games OP specifically mentioned are not games that will cripple an i5 2500.
So is your argument that the i5 2500 + RX 570 isn't optimal for all games currently in existence? Oh no! Thankfully that doesn't appear to be OPs goal. So maybe, a little perspective please?
I wrote short and simple to OPs short and simple starting post without reading all the other messages. Saying "It's bottleneck" doesn't say that it can't run well on some games but it doesn't remove the fact that it is 2011 CPU and 2017 GPU combo. The performance gap is big there.
Bottleneck doesn't say that you can't do something or have fun with it.
Capping frames to 60fps don't often lead to bottlenecks with that combo, but if you want more frames, then it sure will (depending on the game ofc).
Didn't have time and effort to post longer post than "It's bottleneck", because why would I when the original post is lacking them too.
Seems like you said something vague and irrelevant, and are now just trying to argue that you weren't absolutely wrong.
-It's bottleneck.
Just pointing that out and you can figure it out is it good or not.
To rest of the readers, it still is bottleneck combo in some cases, way often than paired with similar year tech.
It seems you do indeed have some knowledge, so if I said otherwise - I apologise. Still, you lack some information that would greatly help you.
For example, this "performance gap" is only around 20%. Seriously, check this out.
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7500-vs-Intel-Core-i5-2500/3648vsm517
But then, if you check 2011's $170 card vs 2017's $170 card - the performance difference is 400%.
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-HD-6850-vs-AMD-RX-570/m7743vs3924
This is why you can't judge by release date, and can't compare CPUs to graphic cards as this is simply different types of hardware going different paths. Modern gaming CPUs have 8 cores, modern gaming GPUs have 4000+ cores - just different.
Well there's always a "bottleneck" in any system if you want to quibble about it badly enough. But since we agree that doesn't matter if performance is sufficient it kind of makes discussing bottlenecks unnecessarily pointless at best, and just trying to flex at worst.
The i5-4590 isn't much faster than an over-clocked 2500k, so I suspect you'll face the same situation: adequate for a lot of games, bottlenecked in a few. And the RX 570 is still a very capable gpu today if you don't mind turning some settings down.