Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
On my 3080 the performance is degrading at +1300 = gives stock like performance, at +1400 it's worse than stock.
That's not proof of anything, just that some had issues with cards. Again, mining cards run 24/7, even a heavy gamer will be putting out what, maybe 60 hours a week on the upper-end? Something running 3x as long is bound to die soon, but again, that doesn't mean it actually LASTS any less time.
*sigh* people always think of the simplest conclusion because complicated multifaceted reasoning is too hard.
its like this entire debate about used mining GPUs. No one seems to mention the stress put on other components other than the gpu die and vram. I think the capacitors and chokes my be more at risk here and fan motors/ barrings.
But there appears to be no clear cut reason for or against. Having conflict that doesn't appear to be resolved that being said of course miners are going to try a justify the resalability of the used cards otherwise they have gpus which are worthless. Due to this miners will likely have significant bias which therefore this means the word of a miner can not be trusted.