安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
did you try to run a benchmark tool to check which part may be the issue?
(userbenchmark or passmark are free)
mind to tell how much fps you see as low fps and in which games?
Do not use v-sync while benchmarking or it'll throw off the results.
Temperature of the GPU stayed at 130 F.
It seems just about everything is underperforming other than some storage.
The framerates of the tests go as follows:
Plane = 144
Cube = 58
Stones = 60
Swarm = 109
Galaxy = 155
Sphere = 10
Honestly, I thought it was just a gpu error until I ran the benchmark, as sleep mode has been a bit buggy and the entire pc would freeze upon waking up by the screen going black for a while.
And as for games, it's just about anything. Though, I find it strange, sometimes the framerate is ok and as expected, but most of the time upon starting it it will be the underperformed framerates.
You're also using 2560 x 1440, so whatever FPS you think you should have, look at benchmarks for that game and GPU, and look at the one for 1080p and 1440.
All of his components especially his GPU are underperforming? Theyre fantastic but slow compared to what he should be hitting. GPU was amongst the 4% slowest benchmarked. He got 87 fps in the Dx9 when average is 179fps.
Clearly there is something wrong with his gpu. OP, have you monitored temperatures and clockspeeds, it could be poor power delivery or maybe the PCIE slot is faulty on the motherboard, try the other one perhaps?
These benchmarks take in overclockers as well, GPU is fine.
Now, if a part was under 100%, that would be bad. Being over 100%, is always good. CPU is barely under for whatever reason but not by much, the SSHD is either fragmented or has a lot of data/wear on it in general, and the RAM should be set to XMP 3200 MHz, which would likely make just the right difference.
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
I'd fix the ram speed thing and see what happens. Should raise the gpu score at least.
You are wrong about 100% aswell. 100% means 2060s result. This is why a 1080ti has 136% on avg. For example my 3080 has 234% based of 100% 2060s.
Settings affect the results, it's running fine.
Or look at any reviewer that shows the resolutions and hz rates, notice how they vary strongly?
I did a test too on 1440p and my fps are not cut in half compare to other results..
https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/36867968
https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/37869996
As for the simulation scores they are very similar if even better at all.
To answer your question about my storage, yes most of them are under heavy use and are old and filled with a lot of data, so I did not expect them to be flawless.
Again, I watched my temps, the cpu to be exact. No core went above 60c and watching the task manager performance report, it never jumped 60% useage. My power source is a Corsair HX 1000i, so I doubt power is the issue unless it's failing.