Intel i7 10700K or AMD Ryzen 9 3900X — which CPU is best for gaming?

[Citizen Cook]

PC gamer claims that the intel CPU is better for gaming than the AMD alternative. What say you?

[supramacy]

the 3900x is better for gaming if you turn off smt.

[Citizen Cook]

Escorve님이 먼저 게시:

Citizen Cook님이 먼저 게시:

True. That's why I think a 3900X would be a more reasonable match for the consoles CPU.

More likely, it would be closer to a 3300X in raw performance.

You are forgetting something I see a lot among PC gamers.

Games are coded to the metal on consoles. PC development is wasteful. In order to get a game to run close to what these consoles will accomplish in 2-3 years from now we'll need to brute force our way by far more powerful hardware. Like for like has not and never will cut it.

[Grimy_RIck]

Citizen Cook님이 먼저 게시:

Escorve님이 먼저 게시:

More likely, it would be closer to a 3300X in raw performance.

You are forgetting something I see a lot among PC gamers.

Games are coded to the metal on consoles. PC development is wasteful. In order to get a game to run close to what these consoles will accomplish in 2-3 years from now we'll need to brute force our way by far more powerful hardware. Like for like has not and never will cut it.

When you say ''What these consoles will accomplish in 2-3 years'' you do understand that at that point the games will run pretty bad on the consoles at lower graphics and lower framerates, i remember getting Battlefield 4 on xbox 360 and it ran like crap, i bought it on the xboxone a couple month later and it ran great, i know this was at the end of life for the xbox360 but my point is just because they make the game run on the console does not mean its runs well, if i remember rightly they also limited the lobby sizes to 32 on the 360 but it was 64 on the one.

[Edifier]

✪ supramacy.님이 먼저 게시:

the 3900x is better for gaming if you turn off smt.

Got any proof of that?
Intel dominates in games and where the i5 10600K seems to be at the top. A budget CPU for gaming dominate the FPS charts.

When doing a top 10 chart for highest FPS Intel takes all of the spots so far.

[r.linder]

✪ supramacy.님이 먼저 게시:

the 3900x is better for gaming if you turn off smt.

Not really true. You might get slightly better boosts due to less threads but it won't make a noticeable difference, and most games have no problems with SMT.

Some games may have a problem with the multi-CCD chips like TR and R9, but that is not related to SMT.

[big baby bobkitten]

Citizen Cook님이 먼저 게시:

Escorve님이 먼저 게시:

More likely, it would be closer to a 3300X in raw performance.

You are forgetting something I see a lot among PC gamers.

Games are coded to the metal on consoles. PC development is wasteful. In order to get a game to run close to what these consoles will accomplish in 2-3 years from now we'll need to brute force our way by far more powerful hardware. Like for like has not and never will cut it.

well i wont even say my 90 or 120 dollar cards name but it was cheap buuut idk it has ddr5 ram and...6008 mhz eh memory clock i think a ps5s umm processor will be 5.8 ghz dont quote me maybe but i think its a clown ladder that will barely newer games in a while eh it was cheap so i will not say what it is and mess u up lol