Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
(that's just my opinion,im not an expert)
Im running a ryzen 5 3600 tough,i had problems using the rx 590 with a phenom ii 955 be,but those new cpu will probably won't affect that much the gpu
In most modern games you're only going to see a ~20 FPS difference between a 2080 Ti and 3080. Most of the large performance gaps are in raytracing performance, not rasterisation.
100%
After seeing test results, the difference is minimal, but none the less an upgrade.
Well while I personally wouldn't do it, you could certainly upgrade to an i 9 9900k... but I've always felt Intel has pretty effectively hobbled the CPU upgrade concept. The only exception is if you've got a real low end Intel CPU and want to upgrade to a high end. I could talk myself into going from an i3 8100 to an i9 9900k quite a bit easier than any i7 to i9 (assuming compatible motherboards)